Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on the Fruit Quality Parameters and Yield of Peach (Prunus persica Batsch) cv. Shan-i-Punjab

Sunil Kumar Gurpinder Kaur

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of Integrated nutrient management on the fruit quality parameters and yield of peach (Prunus persica Batsch) cv. Shan-i-Punjab” was conducted in the Department of Horticulture, Khalsa College, Amritsar during 2019-20. The investigation was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with six treatments which replicated thrice. The treatments were comprised of T1 (100% N through RDF), T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost), T3 (50% of N through RDF + 50% of N through vermicompost, T4 (25% of N through RDF + 75% of N through vermicompost), T5 (100% of N through vermicompost and T6 (Control). Among all treatments, trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67), whereas, the fruit bio-chemical characters in terms of TSS (13.51%), total sugars (9.13%), reducing sugars (6.30%) were recorded under treatment T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost). The treatment T2 advanced the maturity of fruits and also registered max fruit yield (75.82 Kg/ tree). Thus it can be concluded that T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) was more effective than rest of treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced the maximum peach fruit size.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.38 cm x 6.16 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced peach fruit firmness of 5.19 Kg/cm2.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.19 Kg/cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced peach fruit weight of 90.50 g.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
90.50 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced a peach fruit colour score of 9.26.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
fruit coloure0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced an organoleptic rating of 8.67.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
organoleptic ratinge0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) yielded fruits with maximum fruit size (6.38 cm x 6.16 cm), fruit firmness (5.19 Kg/cm2), fruit weight (90.50 g), fruit colour (9.26) and organoleptic rating (8.67)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 gave peach fruit TSS of 13.51%.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Value
13.51%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit bio-chemical characters in terms of TSS (13.51%), total sugars (9.13%), reducing sugars (6.30%) were recorded under treatment T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 gave peach total sugars of 9.13%.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Value
9.13%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit bio-chemical characters in terms of TSS (13.51%), total sugars (9.13%), reducing sugars (6.30%) were recorded under treatment T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 gave peach reducing sugars of 6.30%.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Value
6.30%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit bio-chemical characters in terms of TSS (13.51%), total sugars (9.13%), reducing sugars (6.30%) were recorded under treatment T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 advanced peach fruit maturity.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
maturity of fruitse0
Direction
advancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T2 advanced the maturity of fruits and also registered max fruit yield (75.82 Kg/ tree).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced the maximum peach fruit yield of 75.82 Kg per tree.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maxe0
Value
75.82 Kg/ treee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T2 advanced the maturity of fruits and also registered max fruit yield (75.82 Kg/ tree).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged T2 more effective than the other treatments.

Treatment
T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost)e0
Outcome
more effective than rest of treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (75% of N through RDF + 25% of N through vermicompost) was more effective than rest of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach (Prunus persica Batsch)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.