Paper · 2020 · Journal of Critical Reviews

EFFICACY OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF RADISH (RAPHANUS SATIVUS L)

A. Arockia Jenecius Alphonse

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Radish is a tender tuberous root which could be consumed either in cooked form or raw. It is rich in vitamin C and minerals. Nutrition is one of the main factors which impact the growth and yield of radish. The present investigation is carried out to study the effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth and yield of radish. The various organic manures (seaweed, seagrass and vermicompost) and inorganic fertilizer (NPK) at different concentrations (1, 2 and 4 g for soil amendments) affected the various growth parameters studied. Growth parameters and yield parameters like germination percentage, plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weight and root diameter was found to be high on 40th day in fertilizer treated plants than control plants. The biochemical parameters were estimated on 40thday. Protein, carbohydrate, phenol and flavonoid contents were found to be high with the application of vermicompost (T5) followed by seaweed (T1 & T2), seagrass (T3), NPK (T4) and control (T0) however vitamin C was low with the application of vermicompost (T5). Among the organic manures used for the study, vermicompost was proved to be the best in enhancing the vegetative growth and phytochemical synthesis compared to seaweed, seagrass and inorganic fertilizer (NPK). The beneficial effects of vermicompost as an organic fertilizer have sustaining effects to improve the quality of soil in the long run. Therefore, it could be concluded that, the chemical fertilizers could be replaced by the compost for improving the quality of the yield under safe agriculture conditions, in addition to decreasing the production costs and environmental pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized radish had higher germination, height and leaf area at day 40 than controls.

Treatment
fertilizer treatede0
Outcome
germination percentage, plant height, leaf areae0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
40th daye0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentage, plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weight and root diameter was found to be high on 40th day in fertilizer treated plants than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized radish had higher fresh and dry weight and root diameter at day 40 than controls.

Treatment
fertilizer treatede0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight and root diametere0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
40th daye0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh and dry weight and root diameter was found to be high on 40th day in fertilizer treated plants than control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost produced high protein, carbohydrate and phenol contents.

Treatment
vermicompost (T5)e0
Outcome
Protein, carbohydrate, phenole0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
control (T0)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein, carbohydrate, phenol and flavonoid contents were found to be high with the application of vermicompost (T5) followed by seaweed (T1 & T2), seagrass (T3), NPK (T4) and control (T0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost produced high flavonoid content.

Treatment
vermicompost (T5)e0
Outcome
flavonoid contentse0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
control (T0)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flavonoid contents were found to be high with the application of vermicompost (T5) followed by seaweed (T1 & T2), seagrass (T3), NPK (T4) and control (T0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost reduced vitamin C relative to other treatments.

Treatment
vermicompost (T5)e0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vitamin C was low with the application of vermicompost (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost was judged best for vegetative growth and phytochemical synthesis.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
vegetative growth and phytochemical synthesise0
Comparator
seaweed, seagrass and inorganic fertilizer (NPK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost was proved to be the best in enhancing the vegetative growth and phytochemical synthesis compared to seaweed, seagrass and inorganic fertilizer (NPK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.