Paper · 2021 · African Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

Phytotoxicity of essential oil from Piper nigrum L. on some selected food crops as a potential herbicide in Africa

S H Awojide; K A Oyewole; O O Abiona; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Phytotoxicity of the essential oil (EO) of Piper nigrum L. against Solanum lycopersicum L., Zea mays L. and Vigna unguiculata L. was studied. The GC-MS analysis of the essential oil of P. nigrum shows that linalool (21.73 %) was the major component of the essential oil. The EO retarded the growth of the root and the shoot of S. lycopersicum, Z. mays and V. unguiculata. The inhibition of the root ranged from 64.8-82.8% after 120 hours with a concentration of 4 mL/L, while for the shoot, 100% inhibition was observed with 4 mL/L of the EO formulation after just 96 hours. The phytotoxic effect on the leaves was highest in V. unguiculata and least in S. lycopersicum. Phototoxicity was also observed when the EO formulations were applied to the root of the seedlings of Z. mays and V. unguiculata recorded 100% distress of the seedlings when 3 mL/L of the graded concentration was used after 24 hours. EO from P. nigrum is a potential bio-herbicide with a wide spectrum of use on plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linalool constituted 21.73% of Piper nigrum essential oil.

Taxon
P. nigrumPiper nigrume0
Outcome
linaloole0
Value
21.73 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper nigrum
Piper nigrum · Taxonbreki74 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GC-MS analysis of the essential oil of P. nigrum shows that linalool (21.73 %) was the major component of the essential oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil retarded root and shoot growth in Solanum lycopersicum.

Taxon
S. lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
EOe0
Outcome
growth of the root and the shoote0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EO retarded the growth of the root and the shoot of S. lycopersicum, Z. mays and V. unguiculata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil retarded root and shoot growth in Zea mays.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Treatment
EOe0
Outcome
growth of the root and the shoote0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EO retarded the growth of the root and the shoot of S. lycopersicum, Z. mays and V. unguiculata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oil retarded root and shoot growth in Vigna unguiculata.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
EOe0
Outcome
growth of the root and the shoote0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EO retarded the growth of the root and the shoot of S. lycopersicum, Z. mays and V. unguiculata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root inhibition ranged from 64.8 to 82.8% after 120 hours at 4 mL/L oil.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
4 mL/Le0
Outcome
inhibition of the roote0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
64.8-82.8%e0
Qualifier
after 120 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition of the root ranged from 64.8-82.8% after 120 hours with a concentration of 4 mL/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytotoxicity of the essential oil (EO) of Piper nigrum L. against Solanum lycopersicum L., Zea mays L. and Vigna unguiculata L. was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot inhibition reached 100% after 96 hours at 4 mL/L oil.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicum L.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
4 mL/L of the EO formulatione0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after just 96 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the shoot, 100% inhibition was observed with 4 mL/L of the EO formulation after just 96 hours.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytotoxicity of the essential oil (EO) of Piper nigrum L. against Solanum lycopersicum L., Zea mays L. and Vigna unguiculata L. was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phytotoxicity was highest in Vigna unguiculata.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome
phytotoxic effect on the leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phytotoxic effect on the leaves was highest in V. unguiculata and least in S. lycopersicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–670 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phytotoxicity was lowest in Solanum lycopersicum.

Taxon
S. lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Outcome
phytotoxic effect on the leavese0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The phytotoxic effect on the leaves was highest in V. unguiculata and least in S. lycopersicum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root application at 3 mL/L caused 100% seedling distress in maize after 24 hours.

Taxon
Z. maysZea mayse0
Treatment
3 mL/L of the graded concentratione0
Outcome
distress of the seedlingse0
Direction
distresse0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after 24 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root of the seedlings of Z. mays and V. unguiculata recorded 100% distress of the seedlings when 3 mL/L of the graded concentration was used after 24 hours.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root application at 3 mL/L caused 100% seedling distress in cowpea after 24 hours.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
3 mL/L of the graded concentratione0
Outcome
distress of the seedlingse0
Direction
distresse0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
after 24 hourse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root of the seedlings of Z. mays and V. unguiculata recorded 100% distress of the seedlings when 3 mL/L of the graded concentration was used after 24 hours.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–904 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Piper nigrum oil a potential broad-spectrum bio-herbicide.

Taxon
P. nigrumPiper nigrume0
Outcome
potential bio-herbicide with a wide spectrum of use on plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper nigrum
Piper nigrum · Taxonbreki74 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO from P. nigrum is a potential bio-herbicide with a wide spectrum of use on plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–990 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 60 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 203 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.