Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Ecophysiologic Indices of Wheat as Influenced by Plant Density and Application of Herbicide

Ehsanollah Zeidali; Rahim Naseri; Amir Mirzaei; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of application of herbicides and different plant densities on seed yield, weed density and chlorophyll content in wheat (cv. Bahar), a split plot experiment based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications was conducted at the Agricultural Research Staion of Sarableh, Ilam, in 2014-2015 cropping season. Plant densities in (200, 250 and 300 kg of seed/ha) were considered as main factor and application of herbicides (2, 4-D, Granstar, Shovalyeh, and control, without herbicide application) as sub factor. Results indicated that plant densities affected traits under study significantly. As a result number of seed per spike, 1000-seed weight, relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contents decreased, while weed density and weed dry weight number of spike per m2 and percent lodging increased by increasing plant density. Application of herbicide increased number of spike per m2, number of seed per spike, 1000 seed weight, harvest index, relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contents, while it decreased weed dry weight and its density. Interaction effect of plant density and application of herbicide were significant on seed yield and biological yield. The highest seed yield (5500 kg.ha-1) was produced by using 250 kg seed/ha and application of Granstar herbicide and the lowest (2400 kg.ha-1) from 200 kg seed/ha and without application of herbicide. Thus, using 250 kg seed/ha and Granstar herbicide would increase wheat seed yield in this region as compared with the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density reduced wheat seeds per spike and thousand seed weight.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
number of seed per spike, 1000-seed weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seed per spike, 1000-seed weight, relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contents decreased, while weed density and weed dry weight number of spike per m2 and percent lodging increased by increasing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density reduced relative water and chlorophyll a and b contents.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye1
Outcome
relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contents decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density increased weed density and dry weight.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
weed density and weed dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density and weed dry weight number of spike per m2 and percent lodging increased by increasing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density increased wheat spikes per area and lodging.

Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
number of spike per m2 and percent lodginge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spike per m2 and percent lodging increased by increasing plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application increased spikes per area, seeds per spike, thousand seed weight and harvest index.

Treatment
Application of herbicidee0
Outcome
number of spike per m2, number of seed per spike, 1000 seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of herbicide increased number of spike per m2, number of seed per spike, 1000 seed weight, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application increased wheat relative water and chlorophyll a and b contents.

Treatment
Application of herbicidee0
Outcome
relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of herbicide increased number of spike per m2, number of seed per spike, 1000 seed weight, harvest index, relative water content, chlorophyll a and b contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application decreased weed dry weight and density.

Treatment
Application of herbicidee1
Outcome
weed dry weight and its densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it decreased weed dry weight and its density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–896 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density and herbicide application interacted significantly for seed yield.

Treatment
plant density and application of herbicidee0
Outcome
seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of plant density and application of herbicide were significant on seed yield and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density and herbicide application interacted significantly for biological yield.

Treatment
plant density and application of herbicidee0
Outcome
biological yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of plant density and application of herbicide were significant on seed yield and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

250 kg seed/ha with Granstar yielded the highest seed yield, 5500 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
250 kg seed/ha and application of Granstar herbicidee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5500 kg.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield (5500 kg.ha-1) was produced by using 250 kg seed/ha and application of Granstar herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg seed/ha without herbicide yielded the lowest seed yield, 2400 kg.ha-1.

Treatment
200 kg seed/ha and without application of herbicidee0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
loweste0
Value
2400 kg.ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (2400 kg.ha-1) from 200 kg seed/ha and without application of herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“on seed yield, weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 250 kg seed/ha with Granstar to increase wheat seed yield in this region.

Treatment
250 kg seed/ha and Granstar herbicidee0
Outcome
increase wheat seed yielde0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 250 kg seed/ha and Granstar herbicide would increase wheat seed yield in this region as compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1549 · show in text ↑

herbicide · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.