Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

Impact of Sulfur, Nitrogen Application Methods and Biofertilization on Productivity and Quality of Wheat Crop

Fathy Radwan; Ibrahim Fathallah Rehab; Gamal Khalil ElSakhawy; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at the Experimental Station Farm Facility of Agriculture (Saba-Basha) AlexandriaUniversity, Egypt during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons. The objective of this study was to investigation the effect of sulfur, nitrogen application methods and biofertilization on yield, components and chemical compositions of the Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar to improve wheat productivity and minimizing of pollution. The results could be summarized as follows. Applying sulfur at 400 kg/fed gave higher spike length, number of spikes/m2, weight of spike g/m2 , number of spikelets/spike, 1000- grain weight, grain, straw and biological yields (ton/fed) than 200kg/fed and untreated treatment in both seasons. Also, applying 400 kg/S/fed significantly surpassed untreated treatment for crude protein percentage, N, P and K percentages in both seasons. The addition of mixture nitrogen (soil + foliar) resulted in a significant increment in yield components and chemical composition of wheat grain in both seasons. Significant variation were recorded between the tested biofertilization on yield, yield components and chemical composition of wheat grain in both seasons A- mycorrhizal significantly surpassed uninoculation (control) for yield, yield components and chemical compositions in both seasons. Thus, it is possible to obtain maximum yield, yield components and chemical compositions of grain wheat through applying 400 kg S/fed, mixture nitrogen methods (Soil + foliar) and A- mycorrhizal inoculation (biofertilizer).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 400 kg/fed increased wheat spike length, spike number and spike weight over 200kg/fed and untreated treatments in both seasons.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e1
Treatment
sulfur at 400 kg/fede0
Outcome
spike length, number of spikes/m2, weight of spike g/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
200kg/fed and untreated treatmente0
Setting
Experimental Station Farm Facility of Agriculture (Saba-Basha) AlexandriaUniversity, Egypte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sulfur at 400 kg/fed gave higher spike length, number of spikes/m2, weight of spike g/m2 , number of spikelets/spike, 1000- grain weight, grain, straw and biological yields (ton/fed) than 200kg/fed and untreated treatment in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the Experimental Station Farm Facility of Agriculture (Saba-Basha) AlexandriaUniversity, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 400 kg/fed increased wheat spikelet number and thousand-grain weight over 200kg/fed and untreated treatments in both seasons.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e1
Treatment
sulfur at 400 kg/fede0
Outcome
number of spikelets/spike, 1000- grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
200kg/fed and untreated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sulfur at 400 kg/fed gave higher spike length, number of spikes/m2, weight of spike g/m2 , number of spikelets/spike, 1000- grain weight, grain, straw and biological yields (ton/fed) than 200kg/fed and untreated treatment in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 400 kg/fed increased wheat grain, straw and biological yields over 200kg/fed and untreated treatments in both seasons.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e1
Treatment
sulfur at 400 kg/fede0
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
200kg/fed and untreated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sulfur at 400 kg/fed gave higher spike length, number of spikes/m2, weight of spike g/m2 , number of spikelets/spike, 1000- grain weight, grain, straw and biological yields (ton/fed) than 200kg/fed and untreated treatment in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 400 kg/S/fed significantly increased wheat crude protein percentage over untreated plants in both seasons.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e1
Treatment
400 kg/S/fede0
Outcome
crude protein percentagee0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
untreated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, applying 400 kg/S/fed significantly surpassed untreated treatment for crude protein percentage, N, P and K percentages in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 400 kg/S/fed significantly increased wheat N, P and K percentages over untreated plants in both seasons.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e1
Treatment
400 kg/S/fede0
Outcome
N, P and K percentagese0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
untreated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, applying 400 kg/S/fed significantly surpassed untreated treatment for crude protein percentage, N, P and K percentages in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–868 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed soil and foliar nitrogen significantly increased wheat yield components and grain chemical composition in both seasons.

Treatment
mixture nitrogen (soil + foliar)e0
Outcome
yield components and chemical composition of wheat graine0
Direction
incremente0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of mixture nitrogen (soil + foliar) resulted in a significant increment in yield components and chemical composition of wheat grain in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested biofertilization treatments differed significantly in wheat yield, yield components and grain composition in both seasons.

Treatment
tested biofertilizatione0
Outcome
yield, yield components and chemical composition of wheat graine0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variation were recorded between the tested biofertilization on yield, yield components and chemical composition of wheat grain in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A- mycorrhizal inoculation significantly exceeded the uninoculated control in wheat yield, yield components and chemical composition in both seasons.

Treatment
A- mycorrhizal inoculatione2
Interactor
A- mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
yield, yield components and chemical compositionse0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
uninoculation (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A- mycorrhizal significantly surpassed uninoculation (control) for yield, yield components and chemical compositions in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–375 · show in text ↑
e2

“A- mycorrhizal inoculation (biofertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1542 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 400 kg S/fed, mixed soil and foliar nitrogen and A- mycorrhizal inoculation to maximize wheat yield, yield components and grain composition.

Interactor
A- mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
applying 400 kg S/fed, mixture nitrogen methods (Soil + foliar) and A- mycorrhizal inoculation (biofertilizer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, it is possible to obtain maximum yield, yield components and chemical compositions of grain wheat through applying 400 kg S/fed, mixture nitrogen methods (Soil + foliar) and A- mycorrhizal inoculation (biofertilizer).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1543 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

application · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.