Paper · 2021 · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

Characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial isolates associated with food plants in South Africa

Oluwaseun Adeyinka Fasusi; Adenike Eunice Amoo; Olubukola Oluranti Babalola

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The region around the plant root referred to as the rhizosphere, is the zone where various microbial activity occurs. It performs crucial functions such as increasing the uptake of nutrients for plant development and preventing plant against plant pathogens. Keeping in mind the beneficial role performed by rhizospheric microorganisms, rhizobacterial species were isolated from the maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere. The isolated microorganisms were evaluated for their biochemical characteristics, plant growth-promoting potentials, tolerance to different environmental conditions, and their antifungal activity against Fusarium graminearum, a fungal pathogen that infects maize. The rhizobacterial isolates with multiple plant growth-promoting potentials were identified as Bacillus spp (80.77%), Rhodocyclaceae bacterium (3.85%), Enterococcus spp (3.85%). Massilia spp (3.85%. and Pseudomonas (7.69%) species based on their 16S rRNA molecular characterization. The bacterial isolates possessed antifungal activities against Fusarium graminearum, promote maize and soybeans seed under laboratory conditions, and exhibited different levels of tolerance to pH, temperature, salt, and heavy metal. Based on this, the whole genome sequencing of Bacillus sp. OA1, Pseudomonas rhizosphaerea OA2, and Pseudomonas sp. OA3 was performed using Miseq Illumina system to determine the functional genes and secondary metabolites responsible for their plant growth-promoting potential Thus, the result of this research revealed that the selected bacterial isolates possess plant growth-promoting potentials that can make them a potential candidate to be employed as microbial inoculants for protecting plants against phytopathogens, environmental stress and increasing plant growth and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting isolates were identified as Bacillus spp at 80.77%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Bacillus sppe0symbiont
Outcome
identified as Bacillus sppe0
Value
80.77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rhizobacterial isolates with multiple plant growth-promoting potentials were identified as Bacillus spp (80.77%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting isolates included Rhodocyclaceae bacterium at 3.85%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Rhodocyclaceae bacteriumRhodocyclaceae bacteriume0symbiont
Outcome
Rhodocyclaceae bacteriume0
Value
3.85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhodocyclaceae bacterium (3.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting isolates included Enterococcus spp at 3.85%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Enterococcus sppEnterococcuse0symbiont
Outcome
Enterococcus sppe0
Value
3.85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterococcus
Enterococcus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo Credit: Content Providers(s): CDC/Dr. Mike Miller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterococcus spp (3.85%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–862 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting isolates included Massilia spp at 3.85%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Massilia sppMassiliae0symbiont
Outcome
Massilia sppe0
Value
3.85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Massilia
Massilia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHong-Hui Zhu · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Massilia spp (3.85%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–884 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting isolates included Pseudomonas species at 7.69%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
Pseudomonase0
Value
7.69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas (7.69%) species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial isolates inhibited Fusarium graminearum.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
bacterial isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antifungal activities against Fusarium graminearume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial isolates possessed antifungal activities against Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1052 · show in text ↑
e1

“a fungal pathogen that infects maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial isolates promoted maize seed under laboratory conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
seede0
Treatment
bacterial isolatese0
Interactor
bacterial isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
maizee0
Direction
promotee0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial isolates possessed antifungal activities against Fusarium graminearum, promote maize and soybeans seed under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial isolates promoted soybean seed under laboratory conditions.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
bacterial isolatese0
Interactor
bacterial isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
soybeans seede0
Direction
promotee0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial isolates possessed antifungal activities against Fusarium graminearum, promote maize and soybeans seed under laboratory conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial isolates showed differing tolerance to pH, temperature, salt and heavy metal.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
bacterial isolatese2symbiont
Outcome
different levels of tolerance to pH, temperature, salt, and heavy metale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exhibited different levels of tolerance to pH, temperature, salt, and heavy metal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize and soybean plant's rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 · show in text ↑
e2

“The bacterial isolates possessed antifungal activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1023 · show in text ↑

inoculation · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 24 positive, 9 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.