Paper · 2016

Evaluation the silver nanoparticles on shelf life of Citrus Sinensis

Reza Tadayon; Mehdi Rahimi; Hassan Salari

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, the effect of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles was examined on the survival of the oranges. The experiment was conducted in a factorial design with three factor based on a completely randomized design with three blocks. Treatments were included in the 6 levels of silver nanoparticles (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 ppm), Orange varieties at three levels (Local, Valensia and Blood) and storage cycle at three levels (harvest time, one and three months after harvest). Fruit diameter and length, TDS, Titratable acidity, decay percent, weight of meat and fruit pulp, Vitamin C and electrolyte leakage in zero-day, one-month and three months after storage were measured. The results showed that the nanoparticles had a significant effect on all traits. Concentration of 25 ppm nanoparticles decreased decay percent, 90 percent compared with the control. No significant difference was observed between 20 and 25 ppm concentration. The length and diameter of fruits blood figure was less than the other two varieties. Decay percent in the blood were lower than the other two varieties. The overall results of the blood and 20 and 25 ppm concentration of nanoparticles showed the greatest effect in reducing postharvest losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver nanoparticle concentration significantly affected all measured fruit traits.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Outcome
all traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the nanoparticles had a significant effect on all traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit diameter and length, TDS, Titratable acidity, decay percent, weight of meat and fruit pulp, Vitamin C and electrolyte leakage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25 ppm nanoparticle treatment reduced orange decay by 90 percent relative to control.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
25 ppm nanoparticlese0
Outcome
decay percente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
90 percente0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Concentration of 25 ppm nanoparticles decreased decay percent, 90 percent compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20 and 25 ppm nanoparticle treatments did not differ significantly.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
20e0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Comparator
25 ppm concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant difference was observed between 20 and 25 ppm concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blood orange fruit were shorter than fruit of the other two varieties.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Material
bloode0
Outcome
lengthe0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
other two varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The length and diameter of fruits blood figure was less than the other two varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blood orange fruit had smaller diameter than fruit of the other two varieties.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Material
bloode0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
other two varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The length and diameter of fruits blood figure was less than the other two varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blood orange fruit had lower decay than the other two varieties.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Material
bloode0
Outcome
Decay percente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other two varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Decay percent in the blood were lower than the other two varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify blood oranges with 20 or 25 ppm nanoparticles as having greatest reduction of postharvest losses.

Taxon
Citrus SinensisCitrus sinensist0
Material
bloode0
Treatment
20 and 25 ppm concentration of nanoparticlese0
Outcome
reducing postharvest lossese0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus Sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“The overall results of the blood and 20 and 25 ppm concentration of nanoparticles showed the greatest effect in reducing postharvest losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1247 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.