Abstract
This study was conducted during the kharif, 2020 at ICAR-Perunthalaivar Kamaraj Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Puducherry, India aimed to examine the effect of fortified in situ rice residue compost, zinc nano fertilizer on the growth and yield of rice under rice cultivation methods. The experiment was conducted in a split plot design; 3mainplots (TPR, DSR and AR) and eight subplots (fortified manures and nano zinc particles) with three replications. The results revealed that the TPRsignificantly improved tillers, LAI, productive tillers, panicle weight, grain and straw yield, zinc content and uptake and it was statistically on par with DSRand superior over AR. Nutrient management, fortified manure + ZnO NPs (SP+FS) significantly registered higher growth and yield attributes, Zn content and uptake of rice over to ZnO seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and control. The PGPM, humic acid and seaweed extract fortified organic manures either FYM or rice residue compost, nano zinc as seed priming and foliar spray under TPR or DSR have the potential to maximize rice production without foregoing soil sustainability
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
TPR significantly improved rice tillers, leaf area index, and productive tillers relative to AR and was on par with DSR.
- Treatment
- TPRe0
- Outcome
- tillers, LAI, productive tillerse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- statistically on par with DSRe0
- Comparator
- ARe0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“TPRsignificantly improved tillers, LAI, productive tillers, panicle weight, grain and straw yield, zinc content and uptake and it was statistically on par with DSRand superior over AR”
Claim · model-written summary
TPR significantly improved rice panicle weight and grain and straw yield relative to AR.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“TPRsignificantly improved tillers, LAI, productive tillers, panicle weight, grain and straw yield, zinc content and uptake and it was statistically on par with DSRand superior over AR”
Claim · model-written summary
TPR significantly improved rice zinc content and uptake relative to AR.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“TPRsignificantly improved tillers, LAI, productive tillers, panicle weight, grain and straw yield, zinc content and uptake and it was statistically on par with DSRand superior over AR”
Claim · model-written summary
Fortified manure plus ZnO nanoparticles increased rice growth and yield attributes versus seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- fortified manure + ZnO NPs (SP+FS)e0
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- ZnO seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fortified manure + ZnO NPs (SP+FS) significantly registered higher growth and yield attributes, Zn content and uptake of rice over to ZnO seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and control”
Claim · model-written summary
Fortified manure plus ZnO nanoparticles increased rice zinc content and uptake versus seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and control.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- fortified manure + ZnO NPs (SP+FS)e0
- Outcome
- Zn content and uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- ZnO seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fortified manure + ZnO NPs (SP+FS) significantly registered higher growth and yield attributes, Zn content and uptake of rice over to ZnO seed priming alone, ZnSO4 and control”
The same questions in other papers
zinc oxide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
198 papers more in this group
See all 202 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.