Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Investigation of pathogenesis-related genes expression in rice symbiont with Trichoderma harzianum after inoculation with Magnaporthe oryzae fungus

Somayeh Nazari; Hossein Alaei; Valiollah Babaeizad; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective Rice is one of the most important crops in the world, which occupies a large area of arable land. Blast disease is one of the most important and destructive rice diseases, which reduces production of this product. Due to environmental pollution caused by overuse of fungicides to control this disease and on the other hand, the pathogen resistance to these chemicals, development of better and healthier strategies to control this pathogen is necessary. Biological control of plant diseases using antagonists can be a promising alternative method. Materials and methods In this study, indirect effect of Trichoderma harzianum fungus on pathogenic fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, under greenhouse conditions was investigated by induction of systemic resistance in susceptible Tarom cultivar. For this purpose, expression of several important defense genes was investigated using real-time qPCR technique in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants (without Trichoderma) at different times after infection with pathogenic fungi. Results The results showed increasing expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genes after pathogen inoculation in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to the control plants that there was statistically significat difference about PR2 and PR3 genes. Nevertheles in a number of times, there was no significant difference in expression level of the evaluated genes between two treatments. Examination of various morphological traits such as root, stem and leaf dry weight, root length, stem diameter and plant height showed an increase in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants (without Trichoderma), although this difference was not significant about these traits except for plant height. Chlorophyll a and b levels were also measured as physiological traits in both treatments. Although amount of chlorophyll a was higher in plants symbiont with Trichoderma than control plants, but no significant difference was observed. Phenotypic study of interaction of rice plant and pathogen in presence of Trichoderma showed a significant difference about disease severity in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants. Conclusions These results could somewhat indicate the systemic protection of the rice plant against M. oryzae due to symbiosis of the plant root with Trichoderma harzianum and induction of resistance and increase in pathogenesis-related genes, but this is not enough. Therefore, it is necessary to repeat greenhouse experiment to ensure that there is a significant difference in expression of the studied genes between symbiotic and control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPR1 expression increased after pathogen inoculation in symbiotic plants.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Gene
NPR1e0
Outcome
expression level of NPR1e0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genes after pathogen inoculation in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PR2 expression increased significantly in symbiotic plants.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Gene
PR2e0
Outcome
expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genese0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genes after pathogen inoculation in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to the control plants that there was statistically significat difference about PR2 and PR3 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PR3 expression increased significantly in symbiotic plants.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Gene
PR3e0
Outcome
expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genese0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing expression level of NPR1, PR2 and PR3 genes after pathogen inoculation in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to the control plants that there was statistically significat difference about PR2 and PR3 genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At some times evaluated gene expression did not significantly differ.

Treatment
two treatmentse0
Outcome
expression level of the evaluated genese0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in a number of times, there was no significant difference in expression level of the evaluated genes between two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1439 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiotic plants had higher root, stem, and leaf dry weight without significant differences.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Outcome
root, stem and leaf dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plants (without Trichoderma)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root, stem and leaf dry weight, root length, stem diameter and plant height showed an increase in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants (without Trichoderma), although this difference was not significant about these traits except for plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1761 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length and stem diameter increased without significant differences.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Outcome
root length, stem diametere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plants (without Trichoderma)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root, stem and leaf dry weight, root length, stem diameter and plant height showed an increase in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants (without Trichoderma), although this difference was not significant about these traits except for plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1761 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height increased significantly in symbiotic plants.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plants (without Trichoderma)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root, stem and leaf dry weight, root length, stem diameter and plant height showed an increase in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants (without Trichoderma), although this difference was not significant about these traits except for plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1761 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a was higher in symbiotic plants, without a significant difference.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amount of chlorophyll a was higher in plants symbiont with Trichoderma than control plants, but no significant difference was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity differed significantly in symbiotic plants.

Treatment
plants symbiont with Trichodermae0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference about disease severity in plants symbiont with Trichoderma compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–14 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest systemic protection through root symbiosis and defense gene induction, with uncertainty.

Outcome
systemic protection of the rice plant against M. oryzaee0
Qualifier
symbiosis of the plant root with Trichoderma harzianum and induction of resistance and increase in pathogenesis-related genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could somewhat indicate the systemic protection of the rice plant against M. oryzae due to symbiosis of the plant root with Trichoderma harzianum and induction of resistance and increase in pathogenesis-related genes, but this is not enough”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2229–2469 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend repeating greenhouse experiments.

Outcome
repeat greenhouse experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“necessary to repeat greenhouse experiment to ensure that there is a significant difference in expression of the studied genes between symbiotic and control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2488–2650 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice symbiont”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Trichoderma · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Trichoderma · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.