Paper · 2014 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

IMPACT OF SOME ALTERNATIVE FERTILIZERS SUCH AS ANHYDROUS AMMONIA, HUMIC ACID, ROCK PHOSPHATE AND FELDSPAR ON GROWTH, YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF WHEAT AS WELL AS NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY

S.A. Ismail,; A.M. Abd El-Hafeez; O.A. Galal; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of some alternative fertilizers, namely anhydrousammonia in comparing with urea, humic acid, rock phosphate andfeldspar on growth, yield and its components and nutrient uptake andits availability in soil after harvest for wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)were evaluated in a field experiment. The experiment was conducted atSids Agricultural Research Station (ARC) Beni Swif Governorate2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons in split plot design. Nitrogensources, i.e. anhydrous ammonia or urea at rate of 75 kg N/fed werelocated in the main plots. While, natural fertilizer treatments (without,humic acid, rock phosphate, and feldspar and their combinations atrates of 10, 300 and 400 kg/fed respectively) were added in the subplots.The results show that anhydrous ammonia significantly producedtallest and heaviest plants, more numbers of both spikes/m2 andgrains/spike as well as higher 1000 grain weight and grain and strawyields when compared with urea. Also, plants incorporated withanhydrous ammonia absorbed more N, P and K than that with urea.Injected the soil with anhydrous ammonia significantly improved soilavailable nitrogen after wheat harvest, while soil available P and Kwere not affected. The treatments effects of natural fertilizerscomparing with, without natural fertilizers on growth parameters (plantheight, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spikeand grain and straw yields) could be arranged in the followingdescending order: humic acid > rock phosphate > feldspar. Combinedhumic acid with rock phosphate and /or feldspar were enhanced itseffects than sole applications. Humic acid, rock phosphate or feldsparyielded highest N, P and K uptake by grain and straw, when comparedwith control. Combined natural fertilizers with each other producedmore nutrient uptake than the single one. Humic acid applicationenhanced soil available N, P and K, however rock phosphate andfeldspar significantly improved soil available P and K, respectivelythan untreated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia produced the tallest and heaviest wheat plants compared with urea.

Material
Beni Swif 1e0
Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae1
Outcome
tallest and heaviest plantse1
Direction
talleste1
Comparator
ureae1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“anhydrous ammonia significantly producedtallest and heaviest plants, more numbers of both spikes/m2 and grains/spike as well as higher 1000 grain weight and grain and straw yields when compared with urea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 755–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia gave more spikes/m2 and grains/spike than urea.

Material
Beni Swif 1e0
Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae1
Outcome
numbers of both spikes/m2 and grains/spikee1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
ureae1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“anhydrous ammonia significantly producedtallest and heaviest plants, more numbers of both spikes/m2 and grains/spike as well as higher 1000 grain weight and grain and straw yields when compared with urea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 755–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia gave higher 1000 grain weight and grain and straw yields than urea.

Material
Beni Swif 1e0
Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae1
Outcome
1000 grain weight and grain and straw yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
ureae1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“anhydrous ammonia significantly producedtallest and heaviest plants, more numbers of both spikes/m2 and grains/spike as well as higher 1000 grain weight and grain and straw yields when compared with urea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 755–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plants supplied with anhydrous ammonia absorbed more N, P and K than those supplied with urea.

Material
Beni Swif 1e0
Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae2
Outcome
N, P and Ke2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
ureae2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants incorporated with anhydrous ammonia absorbed more N, P and K than that with urea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 964–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia injected into the soil significantly improved soil available nitrogen after wheat harvest.

Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae3
Outcome
soil available nitrogene3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e3

“Injected the soil with anhydrous ammonia significantly improved soil available nitrogen after wheat harvest”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1051–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Injecting anhydrous ammonia did not affect soil available P and K after wheat harvest.

Treatment
anhydrous ammoniae3
Outcome
soil available P and Ke4
Direction
not affectede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e3

“Injected the soil with anhydrous ammonia significantly improved soil available nitrogen after wheat harvest”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1051–1157 · show in text ↑
e4

“soil available P and Kwere not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural fertilizer treatments ranked humic acid above rock phosphate above feldspar in their effect on wheat growth parameters compared with no natural fertilizer.

Treatment
natural fertilizerse5
Outcome
growth parameterse5
Direction
humic acid > rock phosphate > feldspare6
Comparator
without natural fertilizerse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e5

“without natural fertilizers on growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1315 · show in text ↑
e6

“humic acid > rock phosphate > feldspar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined humic acid with rock phosphate and/or feldspar enhanced effects on wheat compared with sole applications.

Treatment
Combined humic acid with rock phosphate and /or feldspare7
Outcome
effectse7
Direction
enhancede7
Comparator
sole applicationse7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e7

“Combined humic acid with rock phosphate and /or feldspar were enhanced itseffects than sole applications”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1511–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid, rock phosphate or feldspar gave the highest N, P and K uptake by wheat grain and straw compared with control.

Treatment
Humic acid, rock phosphate or feldspare1
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by grain and strawe1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic acid, rock phosphate or feldspar yielded highest N, P and K uptake by grain and straw, when compared with control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1616–1733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined natural fertilizers gave more nutrient uptake than a single natural fertilizer.

Treatment
Combined natural fertilizerse1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
the single onee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined natural fertilizers with each other producedmore nutrient uptake than the single one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application enhanced soil available N, P and K in wheat fields.

Treatment
Humic acid applicatione1
Outcome
soil available N, P and Ke1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic acid application enhanced soil available N, P and K”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1830–1886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate significantly improved soil available P compared with untreated control.

Treatment
rock phosphatee1
Outcome
soil available Pe1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“rock phosphate and feldspar significantly improved soil available P and K, respectively than untreated control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1896–2004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Feldspar significantly improved soil available K compared with untreated control.

Treatment
feldspare1
Outcome
soil available P and Ke1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant (cv Beni Swif 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–261 · show in text ↑
e1

“rock phosphate and feldspar significantly improved soil available P and K, respectively than untreated control”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1896–2004 · show in text ↑

ammonia · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

ammonia · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.