Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Evaluation of the Effect of Amino Acids, Sulphur and Farmyard Manure Along with Phosphorus Fertilization on Wheat Production, Nutrient Status and Soil Properties

O. Galal; M. Sarhan; A. Abd El-Hafeez

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted in the Field of Agricultural Farm of Sids Agricultural Research Station to evaluate the effect of phosphorus rates (0.0, 7.5 and 15 kg P2O5/fed) and some stimulators, i.e.; without, 2% foliar spraying of amino acids twice, 100 kg elemental sulphur and 10 ton FYM/fed) on growth (plant height and dry weight/plant), yield components (number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike and 1000-grain weight), yields (grain and straw yields) and N, P and K concentrations and uptake in grains and straw as well as some soil properties after harvesting, i.e.; soil available N, P and K as well as pH, EC and soil organic matter. The results showed that increasing phosphorus rates increased plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields, nitrogen and phosphorus content in grains and straw, protein percentage in grains, and NPK uptake in grains and/or straw as well as soil available P in soil after harvesting. Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control. FYM improved the N, P and K availability and soil pH and organic matter, while soil salinity was increased due to FYM application. However, sulphur improved soil available P and K and soil pH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised wheat height, dry weight and three yield components.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese0
Outcome
plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing phosphorus rates increased plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised wheat grains per spike and thousand-grain weight.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese0
Outcome
number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing phosphorus rates increased plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing phosphorus rates increased plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised nitrogen and phosphorus content in wheat grains and straw.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus content in grains and strawe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“increasing phosphorus rates increased plant height, dry weight/plant, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-grain weight, grain and straw yields, nitrogen and phosphorus content in grains and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised protein percentage in wheat grain.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
protein percentage in grainse0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“protein percentage in grains, and NPK uptake in grains and/or straw as well as soil available P in soil after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing phosphorus rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised NPK uptake in wheat grains or straw.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
NPK uptake in grains and/or strawe0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“NPK uptake in grains and/or straw as well as soil available P in soil after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing phosphorus rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus raised soil available phosphorus after harvest.

Treatment
increasing phosphorus ratese1
Outcome
soil available P in soil after harvestinge0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil available P in soil after harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1011 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing phosphorus rates increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied amino acids significantly raised wheat growth, yield and nutrients over untreated control.

Treatment
amino acidse0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied sulphur significantly raised wheat growth and yield over untreated control.

Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied FYM significantly raised wheat growth and yield over untreated control.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acids raised wheat grain and straw nutrient content and uptake.

Treatment
amino acidse0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptake in grains and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur raised wheat grain and straw nutrient content and uptake.

Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptake in grains and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM raised wheat grain and straw nutrient content and uptake.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptake in grains and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM improved soil N, P and K availability, pH and organic matter.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
N, P and K availability and soil pH and organic mattere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“FYM improved the N, P and K availability and soil pH and organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased soil salinity.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil salinity was increased due to FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur improved soil available P and K and soil pH.

Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
soil available P and K and soil pHe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulphur improved soil available P and K and soil pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1396 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.