Abstract
The objective of the present study was to estimate the effect of elementary sulphur and of other sulphur fertilisers on the yield and qualitative parameters of spring wheat. This topic was studied in the form of a pot trial in a vegetation hall in 2003. Each pot was filled with 6 kg of a mixture of fluvisoil and sand, pH 6.9; content of available P 83; K 103 (with additional fertilising to 171); Ca 2058; Mg 184; total water-soluble sulphur 22 and sulphur sulphate 18 mg kg-1. The following variants were applied in the trial: 1. Control. 2. Elementary sulphur applied into the soil. 3. Ammonium sulphate. 4. Pregips H gypsum. 5. Foliar application of elementary sulphur. Basic fertilisation consisted of an application of 0.61 g of nitrogen and 0.24 g of sulphur per pot, with the exception of the last variant, where two foliar doses of elementary sulphur were applied, i.e. 0.026 and 0.019 g of S per pot in DC 31 DC 57, respectively. The results were evaluated by means of variance analysis, and Tukey’s test was used for subsequent tests of significance of differences among the variants. The results of the one-year vegetation pot trial where various fertilisers containing sulphur were applied to spring wheat can be summarised as follows: Applications of elementary sulphur resulted in the highest grain yields; In the variant where elementary sulphur was applied to the soil the uptake of nitrogen by the grain was the highest and the exploitation of nitrogenous fertilisers was the best; The content of sulphur in the grain as the requirement for good baking quality was insufficient and the best results were achieved after foliar application of elementary sulphur; Compared to the standard, the content of nitrogenous substances was low, and was the highest in the variant where Pregips H gypsum was applied; The falling number was above 400 s signalising a low specific volume of bakery products and a dry and crumbly crumb; Applications of ammonium sulphate gave the best results in terms of the 1000-grain weight and proportion of grain over 2.5 mm on the sieve; The application of elementary sulphur into the soil did not reduce the soil pH and after harvest provided the highest supply of available sulphur in the soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Elementary sulphur produced the highest wheat grain yields.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- elementary sulphure0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“Applications of elementary sulphur resulted in the highest grain yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil applied elementary sulphur gave the highest grain nitrogen uptake.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- elementary sulphur was applied to the soile0
- Outcome
- uptake of nitrogen by the graine0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“In the variant where elementary sulphur was applied to the soil the uptake of nitrogen by the grain was the highest”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil applied elementary sulphur gave the best exploitation of nitrogenous fertilizers.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- elementary sulphur was applied to the soile0
- Outcome
- exploitation of nitrogenous fertiliserse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“In the variant where elementary sulphur was applied to the soil the uptake of nitrogen by the grain was the highest and the exploitation of nitrogenous fertilisers was the best”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain sulphur content was insufficient for good baking quality, with the best results after foliar elementary sulphur.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of elementary sulphure0
- Outcome
- content of sulphur in the graine0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- insufficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“The content of sulphur in the grain as the requirement for good baking quality was insufficient and the best results were achieved after foliar application of elementary sulphur”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain nitrogenous substances were low versus the standard and highest with Pregips H gypsum.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pregips H gypsume0
- Outcome
- content of nitrogenous substancese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- standarde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“Compared to the standard, the content of nitrogenous substances was low, and was the highest in the variant where Pregips H gypsum was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain falling number exceeded 400 s, indicating poor bread characteristics.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- falling numbere0
- Direction
- abovee0
- Value
- 400 se0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“The falling number was above 400 s signalising a low specific volume of bakery products and a dry and crumbly crumb”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulphate gave the best 1000 grain weight and proportion of grain over 2.5 mm.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- ammonium sulphatee0
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weight and proportion of grain over 2.5 mm on the sievee0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“Applications of ammonium sulphate gave the best results in terms of the 1000-grain weight and proportion of grain over 2.5 mm on the sieve”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil applied elementary sulphur did not reduce soil pH.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of elementary sulphur into the soile0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“The application of elementary sulphur into the soil did not reduce the soil pH”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil applied elementary sulphur provided the highest available soil sulphur after harvest.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- application of elementary sulphur into the soile0
- Outcome
- supply of available sulphur in the soile0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- after harveste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat grain”
e0“The application of elementary sulphur into the soil did not reduce the soil pH and after harvest provided the highest supply of available sulphur in the soil”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →ammonium sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
111 papers more in this group
See all 115 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.