Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FYM raised wheat grain and straw nutrient content and uptake.

A claim from Evaluation of the Effect of Amino Acids, Sulphur and Farmyard Manure Along with Phosphorus Fertilization on Wheat Production, Nutrient Status and Soil Properties · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM raised wheat grain and straw nutrient content and uptake.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptake in grains and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113
e0

“Applied amino acids, sulphur or FYM significantly increased all studied growth parameters, yield and its components and nutrient content and uptake in grains and straw over untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1204

Title

Evaluation of the Effect of Amino Acids, Sulphur and Farmyard Manure Along with Phosphorus Fertilization on Wheat Production, Nutrient Status and Soil Properties

O. Galal; M. Sarhan; A. Abd El-Hafeez Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2017. doi:10.21608/jssae.2017.37238

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-eaaab937f431f895c6d7483778d60423c9a49191dbbdbb9c2d0ad70120cf94da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this claim · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

950 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.