Paper · 2020 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Enhancing cane and sugar productivity applying variable modes of plant growth regulators in sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex) cultivation under coastal climatic conditions of India

J R PATNAIK; P K NAYAK

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out for three crop seasons at Sugarcane Research Station, Nayagarh (Odisha) during spring seasons of 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 to assess the effect of ethrel and gibberellic acid on growth, yield attributing characters, yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex). Pooled data of three years study indicated that different treatments with plant growth regulators had significant effect on growth, yield and quality parameters of sugarcane. Germination percent of cane buds was the highest in the treatment involving planting of sugarcane setts after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after planting (DAP). Other sugarcane growth parameters, viz. number of tillers and plant heights were significantly higher with the application of growth regulators which produced higher number of millable canes (at harvest) than that of other treatments in the test. Overnight soaking of cane setts in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after planting also produced significantly higher yield parameters, viz. number of millable cane (84.26’ 000 ha-1), cane length (313.6 cm), cane girth (2.94 cm) and single cane weight (1.64 kg) as compared to conventionally planted sugarcane crop. There was no significant influence on juice quality parameters due to various treatments in this study. However, overnight soaking of setts with 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after planting showed comparatively higher values in all the juice quality parameters. Significantly higher cane and sugar yields of 116.14 t/ha and 12.82 t/ha, respectively were obtained with planting of sugarcane after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by gibberellic acid spray @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after planting. The above higher yields were attributed mainly to marked improvement in growth and yield attributes in response to application of plant growth regulators. Therefore, it can be concluded that combined application of ethrel and gibberellic acid had the positive effect to improve the growth parameters, yield and quality of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ethrel soaking and gibberellic acid spray gave the highest cane bud germination.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after planting (DAP)e0
Outcome
Germination percent of cane budse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percent of cane buds was the highest in the treatment involving planting of sugarcane setts after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased tiller number and plant height significantly.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of growth regulatorse0
Outcome
number of tillers and plant heightse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of tillers and plant heights were significantly higher with the application of growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment yielded 84.26’ 000 ha-1 millable canes, significantly above conventional planting.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Overnight soaking of cane setts in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after plantinge0
Outcome
number of millable canee0
Direction
highere0
Value
84.26’ 000 ha-1e0
Comparator
conventionally planted sugarcane crope0

Verbatim

e0

“Overnight soaking of cane setts in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid @35 ppm at 90,120 and 150 days after planting also produced significantly higher yield parameters, viz. number of millable cane (84.26’ 000 ha-1), cane length (313.6 cm), cane girth (2.94 cm) and single cane weight (1.64 kg) as compared to conventionally planted sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced cane length of 313.6 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane lengthe0
Value
313.6 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“cane length (313.6 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced cane girth of 2.94 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane girthe0
Value
2.94 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“cane girth (2.94 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment produced single cane weight of 1.64 kg.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
single cane weighte0
Value
1.64 kge0

Verbatim

e0

“single cane weight (1.64 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had no significant effect on juice quality parameters.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
juice quality parameterse0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant influence on juice quality parameters due to various treatments in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane (Saccharum sp. complex)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment yielded 116.14 t/ha cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by gibberellic acid spray @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after plantinge0
Outcome
canee0
Direction
highere0
Value
116.14 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher cane and sugar yields of 116.14 t/ha and 12.82 t/ha, respectively were obtained with planting of sugarcane after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by gibberellic acid spray @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment yielded 12.82 t/ha sugar.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by gibberellic acid spray @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after plantinge0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.82 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher cane and sugar yields of 116.14 t/ha and 12.82 t/ha, respectively were obtained with planting of sugarcane after overnight soaking in 100 ppm ethrel solution followed by gibberellic acid spray @ 35 ppm at 90, 120 and 150 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1981 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

class · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 65 positive, 7 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.