Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Nanoparticles as Potential Improvement for Conventional Fertilisation in the Cultivation of Raphanus sativus var. sativus

Lidia Mielcarz-Skalska; Beata Smolińska; Katarzyna Włodarczyk

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of nanoparticles in fertilisation has confirmed positive effects on plant growth and yield. Simultaneously, there is still little research into the effects of nanoparticles on the antioxidant system of plants. Due to the positive effect of nano zinc oxide on plants and the special property of nano zero-valent iron, these particles were selected for the research. The nano zero-valent iron is crucial for plants as it is present in agglomerations on the surface of roots where it increases the absorptive surface of the rhizosphere and causes elongation of the roots. The study aims to determine the influence of selected nanoparticles as a potential improvement for conventional fertilisation by magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). After the cultivation, the influence of nanoparticles on the accumulation of macronutrients in plant tissues, biometric parameters, and physiological response (chlorophyll and antioxidant system) of radish (Raphanus sativus) were assessed. The solution used in this study helped to increase the content of nitrates (V) in radish roots by 31.7–73.2% compared to conventional fertilisation. Nevertheless, nanoparticles supplementation resulted in a decrease in the concentrations of magnesium, iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in plants. The high dose of used fertilisers increased the thickness and length of tubers by approximately 50.0%, compared to the control samples. The “Macro 2 + nano” variant caused an increase of plant biomass up to 70.0%. The analysis of the antioxidant system showed that the application of macronutrients with nanoparticles increased the concentration of polyphenols in plant tubers by 46.0–55.6%. Interestingly, while implemented conditions caused a 1.5-fold increase in CAT activity in leaves, at the same time the decrease in CAT activity in plant roots was observed. Based on the obtained results of the enzymatic antioxidant system and biometric parameters of plants, it can be concluded that (in laboratory conditions) nZVI and nanoZnO are efficient components of fertilisers. However, the effects on other organisms must be investigated before implementing a method for widespread use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle supplementation increased nitrate content in radish roots by 31.7–73.2% versus conventional fertilisation.

Treatment
The solution used in this studye0
Outcome
content of nitrates (V) in radish rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.7–73.2%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilisatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The solution used in this study helped to increase the content of nitrates (V) in radish roots by 31.7–73.2% compared to conventional fertilisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle supplementation decreased magnesium, iron and zinc concentrations in plants.

Treatment
nanoparticles supplementatione0
Outcome
concentrations of magnesium, iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in plantse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoparticles supplementation resulted in a decrease in the concentrations of magnesium, iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“After the cultivation, the influence of nanoparticles on the accumulation of macronutrients in plant tissues, biometric parameters, and physiological response (chlorophyll and antioxidant system) of radish (Raphanus sativus) were assessed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high fertiliser dose increased tuber thickness and length by approximately 50.0% versus controls.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Organ / stage
tuberse0
Treatment
The high dose of used fertiliserse0
Outcome
thickness and length of tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 50.0%e0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high dose of used fertilisers increased the thickness and length of tubers by approximately 50.0%, compared to the control samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Macro 2 + nano variant increased plant biomass up to 70.0%.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Treatment
Macro 2 + nanoe0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The “Macro 2 + nano” variant caused an increase of plant biomass up to 70.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macronutrients with nanoparticles increased tuber polyphenol concentration by 46.0–55.6%.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Organ / stage
plant tuberse0
Treatment
application of macronutrients with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
concentration of polyphenols in plant tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
46.0–55.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of macronutrients with nanoparticles increased the concentration of polyphenols in plant tubers by 46.0–55.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The implemented conditions increased leaf CAT activity 1.5-fold.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
implemented conditionse0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT activity in leavese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“implemented conditions caused a 1.5-fold increase in CAT activity in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The implemented conditions decreased root CAT activity.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Organ / stage
plant rootse0
Treatment
implemented conditionse0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT activity in plant rootse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while implemented conditions caused a 1.5-fold increase in CAT activity in leaves, at the same time the decrease in CAT activity in plant roots was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nZVI and nanoZnO are efficient fertiliser components under laboratory conditions.

Taxon
Raphanus sativus var. sativusRaphanus sativus var. sativust0
Outcome
nZVI and nanoZnO are efficient components of fertiliserse0
Setting
laboratory conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus var. sativus
Raphanus sativus var. sativus · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it can be concluded that (in laboratory conditions) nZVI and nanoZnO are efficient components of fertilisers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Raphanus sativus var. sativus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–121 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.