Abstract
The field work was conducted at the Experimental Farm of Desert Research Center at Mariout during two winter successive seasons, 2017/2018 and 2018/2019, to study assess response to seed soaking with ascorbic acid (AS), (0, 25, 50 and 75 ppm) and foliar spraying with salicylic acid (SA) at (0, 50, 100 and 150 ppm) on yield and yield components and seed chemical composition on faba bean cv. (Mariout-2). Obtained results in this study clearly proved the role of AS and SA in increasing calcareous of faba bean plants. The highest rates from (AS) was increased significantly yield, yield components and nitrogen content in both growing seasons. Either seed soaking in AS, (25 ppm) or foliar application of SA (50 ppm) exhibited significant increments in all yield parameters compared with untreated control. Moreover, rate of AS treatment in seed soaking at (50 ppm) and foliar spray with SA at 100 ppm induced significant increases in the protein and N content of faba bean seed compared with the control groups. The magnitude of increments was pronounced in response to 75 ppm seed soaking of ascorbic acid and 150 ppm of SA as a foliar spray on faba bean cv. (Mariout- 2), which led to positive changes in all studied parameters
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The highest ascorbic acid rates significantly increased faba bean yield and yield components in both seasons.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- highest rates from (AS)e0
- Outcome
- yield, yield componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both growing seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest rates from (AS) was increased significantly yield, yield components and nitrogen content in both growing seasons.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest ascorbic acid rates significantly increased nitrogen content in both seasons.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- highest rates from (AS)e0
- Outcome
- nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both growing seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest rates from (AS) was increased significantly yield, yield components and nitrogen content in both growing seasons.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking seed in 25 ppm ascorbic acid significantly increased all yield parameters compared with untreated controls.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- seed soaking in AS, (25 ppm)e0
- Outcome
- all yield parameterse0
- Direction
- incrementse0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed soaking in AS, (25 ppm) or foliar application of SA (50 ppm) exhibited significant increments in all yield parameters compared with untreated control.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of 50 ppm salicylic acid significantly increased all yield parameters compared with untreated controls.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of SA (50 ppm)e0
- Outcome
- all yield parameterse0
- Direction
- incrementse0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of SA (50 ppm) exhibited significant increments in all yield parameters compared with untreated control.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed soaking with 50 ppm ascorbic acid significantly increased seed protein and N content compared with controls.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- AS treatment in seed soaking at (50 ppm)e0
- Outcome
- protein and N content of faba bean seede0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- control groupse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“rate of AS treatment in seed soaking at (50 ppm) and foliar spray with SA at 100 ppm induced significant increases in the protein and N content of faba bean seed compared with the control groups.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spraying with 100 ppm salicylic acid significantly increased seed protein and N content compared with controls.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- foliar spray with SA at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- protein and N content of faba bean seede0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- control groupse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray with SA at 100 ppm induced significant increases in the protein and N content of faba bean seed compared with the control groups.”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed soaking with 75 ppm ascorbic acid produced pronounced positive changes in all studied parameters.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- 75 ppm seed soaking of ascorbic acide0
- Outcome
- all studied parameterse0
- Direction
- positive changese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The magnitude of increments was pronounced in response to 75 ppm seed soaking of ascorbic acid and 150 ppm of SA as a foliar spray on faba bean cv. (Mariout- 2), which led to positive changes in all studied parameters”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spraying with 150 ppm salicylic acid produced pronounced positive changes in all studied parameters.
- Taxon
- faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- 150 ppm of SA as a foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- all studied parameterse0
- Direction
- positive changese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The magnitude of increments was pronounced in response to 75 ppm seed soaking of ascorbic acid and 150 ppm of SA as a foliar spray on faba bean cv. (Mariout- 2), which led to positive changes in all studied parameters”
t0“faba bean (Vicia faba L.)”
The same questions in other papers
ascorbic acid · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →salicylic acid · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →ascorbic acid · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
salicylic acid · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ascorbic acid · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →seed treatment · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.