Abstract
Based on our findings, it can be concluded that soybean crop can be successfully raised with conservation agricultural (CA) practices with a reasonably high level of productivity and profitablity. The higher productivity and profitability was recorded under conservation agricultural practices involving zero-tillage-bed with wheat crop residue of 3.0 t/ha. The yield improvement of soybean with ZT–B + R was 16.2%, 10.96% and 5.3% compared with CT–R, ZT–R and ZT + R, respectively. The significantly highest gross (65000 ₹/ha), net returns (35100 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.18) were obtained with ZT–B + R. Among phosphorus fertilization practices, soybean responded well up to 80 kg P2O5/ha (34.5 kg P/ha) as basal application with increase in crop productivity and profitablity. Yield improvement with 80 kg P2O5/ha was 21.6% and 13.9% compared to 0 and 40 kg P2O5/ha, respectively. However, application of 120 kg P2O5/ha (52.5 kg P/ha) didn’t show any significant increment in productivity and profitablity over 80 kg P2O5/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Zero-tillage-bed with wheat residue gave higher soybean productivity and profitability.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- zero-tillage-bed with wheat crop residue of 3.0 t/hae0
- Outcome
- productivity and profitabilitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher productivity and profitability was recorded under conservation agricultural practices involving zero-tillage-bed with wheat crop residue of 3.0 t/ha.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield with ZT–B + R improved by 16.2% against CT–R.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- ZT–B + Re0
- Outcome
- yield improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 16.2%e0
- Comparator
- CT–Re0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield improvement of soybean with ZT–B + R was 16.2%, 10.96% and 5.3% compared with CT–R, ZT–R and ZT + R, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield with ZT–B + R improved by 10.96% against ZT–R.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- ZT–B + Re0
- Outcome
- yield improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 10.96%e0
- Comparator
- ZT–Re0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield improvement of soybean with ZT–B + R was 16.2%, 10.96% and 5.3% compared with CT–R, ZT–R and ZT + R, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield with ZT–B + R improved by 5.3% against ZT + R.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- ZT–B + Re0
- Outcome
- yield improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 5.3%e0
- Comparator
- ZT + Re0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield improvement of soybean with ZT–B + R was 16.2%, 10.96% and 5.3% compared with CT–R, ZT–R and ZT + R, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
ZT–B + R gave the highest gross return of 65000 ₹/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest gross (65000 ₹/ha), net returns (35100 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.18) were obtained with ZT–B + R.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
ZT–B + R gave the highest net return of 35100 ₹/ha.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest gross (65000 ₹/ha), net returns (35100 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.18) were obtained with ZT–B + R.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
ZT–B + R gave the highest B:C ratio of 2.18.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest gross (65000 ₹/ha), net returns (35100 ₹/ha) and B:C ratio (2.18) were obtained with ZT–B + R.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield improved 21.6% with 80 kg P2O5/ha versus zero phosphorus.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 80 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- Yield improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 21.6%e0
- Comparator
- 0e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield improvement with 80 kg P2O5/ha was 21.6% and 13.9% compared to 0 and 40 kg P2O5/ha, respectively.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield improved 13.9% with 80 kg P2O5/ha versus 40 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 80 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- Yield improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Value
- 13.9%e0
- Comparator
- 40 kg P2O5/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield improvement with 80 kg P2O5/ha was 21.6% and 13.9% compared to 0 and 40 kg P2O5/ha, respectively.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean profitability increased with basal phosphorus up to 80 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 80 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- profitablitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soybean responded well up to 80 kg P2O5/ha (34.5 kg P/ha) as basal application with increase in crop productivity and profitablity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus to 120 kg P2O5/ha gave no significant productivity increment versus 80 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 120 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- didn’t show any significant incremente0
- Comparator
- 80 kg P2O5/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 120 kg P2O5/ha (52.5 kg P/ha) didn’t show any significant increment in productivity and profitablity over 80 kg P2O5/ha.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus to 120 kg P2O5/ha gave no significant profitability increment versus 80 kg P2O5/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- 120 kg P2O5/hae0
- Outcome
- profitablitye0
- Direction
- didn’t show any significant incremente0
- Comparator
- 80 kg P2O5/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 120 kg P2O5/ha (52.5 kg P/ha) didn’t show any significant increment in productivity and profitablity over 80 kg P2O5/ha.”
t0“soybean (Glycine max)”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →phosphorus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
351 papers more in this group
See all 355 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.