Paper · 2021 · BMC Genomics

Wheat transcriptome profiling reveals abscisic and gibberellic acid treatments regulate early-stage phytohormone defense signaling, cell wall fortification, and metabolic switches following Fusarium graminearum-challenge

Leann M. Buhrow; Ziying Liu; Dustin Cram; et al.

15
claims
24
verbatim quotes
29
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of wheat with the phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) has been shown to affect Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease severity. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the elicited phenotypes remain unclear. Toward addressing this gap in our knowledge, global transcriptomic profiling was applied to the FHB-susceptible wheat cultivar 'Fielder' to map the regulatory responses effected upon treatment with ABA, an ABA receptor antagonist (AS6), or GA in the presence or absence of Fusarium graminearum (Fg) challenge. RESULTS: Spike treatments resulted in a total of 30,876 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in 'Fielder' (26,004) and the Fg (4872) pathogen. Topology overlap and correlation analyses defined 9689 wheat DEGs as Fg-related across the treatments. Further enrichment analyses demonstrated that these included expression changes within 'Fielder' defense responses, cell structural metabolism, molecular transport, and membrane/lipid metabolism. Dysregulation of ABA and GA crosstalk arising from repression of 'Fielder' FUS3 was noted. As well, expression of a putative Fg ABA-biosynthetic cytochrome P450 was detected. The co-applied condition of Fg + ABA elicited further up-regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis, as well as SA and ET signaling pathways and cell wall/polyphenolic metabolism. In contrast, co-applied Fg + GA mainly suppressed phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling, while modulating primary and secondary metabolism and flowering. Unexpectedly, co-applied Fg + AS6 did not affect ABA biosynthesis or signaling, but rather elicited antagonistic responses tied to stress, phytohormone transport, and FHB disease-related genes. CONCLUSIONS: Observed exacerbation (misregulation) of classical defense mechanisms and cell wall fortifications upon ABA treatment are consistent with its ability to promote FHB severity and its proposed role as a fungal effector. In contrast, GA was found to modulate primary and secondary metabolism, suggesting a general metabolic shift underlying its reduction in FHB severity. While AS6 did not antagonize traditional ABA pathways, its impact on host defense and Fg responses imply potential for future investigation. Overall, by comparing these findings to those previously reported for four additional plant genotypes, an additive model of the wheat-Fg interaction is proposed in the context of phytohormone responses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike treatments yielded 30,876 differentially expressed genes across wheat and Fusarium graminearum.

Taxon
'Fielder'e0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e0
Value
30,876e0

Verbatim

e0

“Spike treatments resulted in a total of 30,876 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in 'Fielder' (26,004) and the Fg (4872) pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fielder had 26,004 differentially expressed genes.

Taxon
'Fielder'e0
Material
'Fielder'e0
Outcome
'Fielder'e0
Value
26,004e0

Verbatim

e0

“'Fielder' (26,004) and the Fg (4872) pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium graminearum had 4,872 differentially expressed genes.

Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
Fge0
Value
4872e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fg (4872) pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across treatments, 9,689 wheat differentially expressed genes were related to Fg.

Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
wheat DEGse0
Value
9689e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topology overlap and correlation analyses defined 9689 wheat DEGs as Fg-related across the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fg-related genes included changes in defense, cell structural metabolism, molecular transport and membrane or lipid metabolism.

Taxon
'Fielder'e0
Material
'Fielder'e0
Outcome
expression changese0

Verbatim

e0

“these included expression changes within 'Fielder' defense responses, cell structural metabolism, molecular transport, and membrane/lipid metabolism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1018 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FUS3 repression was associated with dysregulated ABA and GA crosstalk.

Taxon
'Fielder'e0
Gene
'Fielder' FUS3e0
Outcome
Dysregulation of ABA and GA crosstalke0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Dysregulation of ABA and GA crosstalk arising from repression of 'Fielder' FUS3 was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expression of a putative Fg ABA biosynthetic cytochrome P450 was detected.

Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Gene
Fg ABA-biosynthetic cytochrome P450e0
Outcome
expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“expression of a putative Fg ABA-biosynthetic cytochrome P450 was detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied Fg and ABA increased phytohormone biosynthesis, SA and ET signaling, and cell wall or polyphenolic metabolism.

Treatment
Fg + ABAe0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
phytohormone biosynthesis, as well as SA and ET signaling pathways and cell wall/polyphenolic metabolisme0
Direction
up-regulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-applied condition of Fg + ABA elicited further up-regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis, as well as SA and ET signaling pathways and cell wall/polyphenolic metabolism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied Fg and GA suppressed phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling.

Treatment
Fg + GAe0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
phytohormone biosynthesis and signalinge0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-applied Fg + GA mainly suppressed phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied Fg and GA modulated primary and secondary metabolism and flowering.

Treatment
Fg + GAe0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
primary and secondary metabolism and floweringe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-applied Fg + GA mainly suppressed phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling, while modulating primary and secondary metabolism and flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied Fg and AS6 did not affect ABA biosynthesis or signaling.

Treatment
Fg + AS6e0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
ABA biosynthesis or signalinge0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-applied Fg + AS6 did not affect ABA biosynthesis or signaling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applied Fg and AS6 elicited antagonistic stress, phytohormone transport and FHB related gene responses.

Treatment
Fg + AS6e0
Interactor
Fge0pathogen
Outcome
antagonistic responses tied to stress, phytohormone transport, and FHB disease-related genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-applied Fg + AS6 did not affect ABA biosynthesis or signaling, but rather elicited antagonistic responses tied to stress, phytohormone transport, and FHB disease-related genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA treatment exacerbated classical defense mechanisms and cell wall fortifications.

Treatment
ABA treatmente0
Outcome
classical defense mechanisms and cell wall fortificationse0
Direction
exacerbatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Observed exacerbation (misregulation) of classical defense mechanisms and cell wall fortifications upon ABA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA modulated primary and secondary metabolism, suggesting a metabolic shift linked to lower FHB severity.

Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
reduction in FHB severitye0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
general metabolic shifte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA was found to modulate primary and secondary metabolism, suggesting a general metabolic shift underlying its reduction in FHB severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed an additive model of the wheat–Fg interaction in phytohormone responses.

Outcome
additive model of the wheat-Fg interactione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an additive model of the wheat-Fg interaction is proposed in the context of phytohormone responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2347–2446 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.