Paper · 2021 · Biotechnology Reports

Trehalose: A mycogenic cell wall elicitor elicit resistance against leaf spot disease of broccoli and acts as a plant growth regulator

Savitha De Britto; Shreya M. Joshi; Sudisha Jogaiah

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Elicitors are biochemicals, and the cell wall-derived elicitors from fungi can trigger defence mechanisms in plants by increasing the phytoalexin accumulation when they encounter the pathogens. The main objective of this research was to purify and characterize a cell wall elicitor from Trichoderma atroviride (TaCWE) and evaluate the seed priming effect of that elicitor for inducing systemic resistance in broccoli plants against leaf spot disease. Amongst the tested TaCWE concentrations of the seed priming (5, 10, & 25 mg ml−1), 10.0 mg ml−1 showed significantly (P < 0.05) improved early emergence, the rate of germination at 94%, and observed seedling vigour of 2601. Also, elicitor (10 mg ml−1) treatment alone induced 57% plant protection. On the contrary, the elicitor treated and pathogen inoculated plants induced a notable 72% protection against leaf spot disease of broccoli caused by A. brassicicola. Thus, the primed seeds with elicitor showed induced disease resistance and plant growth promotion. The prominent molecule present in the purified extracted cell wall elicitor is confirmed as trehalose. The AFM analysis indicated the trehalose length and width as 10.16 µm and 2.148 µm, respectively. FTIR chromatogram further confirmed trehalose in abundance with traces of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and LC-MS profile with a single peak eluted with a retention time of 3.78 min. The findings of this study contribute to understanding better the role of trehalose, a biogenic cell-wall elicitor that can induce systemic resistance against leaf spot disease and regulate plant growth in the broccoli plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming at 10.0 mg ml−1 improved early emergence.

Treatment
10.0 mg ml−1e0
Outcome
early emergencee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 mg ml−1 showed significantly (P < 0.05) improved early emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10.0 mg ml−1 priming treatment yielded a 94% germination rate.

Treatment
10.0 mg ml−1e0
Outcome
rate of germinatione0
Value
94%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 mg ml−1 showed significantly (P < 0.05) improved early emergence, the rate of germination at 94%, and observed seedling vigour of 2601.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10.0 mg ml−1 priming treatment yielded seedling vigour of 2601.

Treatment
10.0 mg ml−1e0
Outcome
seedling vigoure0
Value
2601e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 mg ml−1 showed significantly (P < 0.05) improved early emergence, the rate of germination at 94%, and observed seedling vigour of 2601.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elicitor alone provided 57% plant protection.

Treatment
elicitor (10 mg ml−1) treatment alonee0
Outcome
plant protectione0
Direction
inducede0
Value
57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elicitor (10 mg ml−1) treatment alone induced 57% plant protection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elicitor treatment plus pathogen inoculation provided 72% protection against A. brassicicola leaf spot.

Treatment
elicitor treated and pathogen inoculatede0
Interactor
A. brassicicolae0pathogen
Outcome
protection against leaf spot diseasee0
Direction
inducede0
Value
72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the elicitor treated and pathogen inoculated plants induced a notable 72% protection against leaf spot disease of broccoli caused by A. brassicicola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trehalose was confirmed as the main molecule of the purified fungal cell wall elicitor.

Outcome
prominent molecule present in the purified extracted cell wall elicitore0
Qualifier
trehalosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The prominent molecule present in the purified extracted cell wall elicitor is confirmed as trehalose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AFM measured trehalose length as 10.16 µm.

Outcome
trehalose lengthe0
Value
10.16 µme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AFM analysis indicated the trehalose length and width as 10.16 µm and 2.148 µm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AFM measured trehalose width as 2.148 µm.

Outcome
widthe0
Value
2.148 µme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AFM analysis indicated the trehalose length and width as 10.16 µm and 2.148 µm, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FTIR confirmed abundant trehalose with traces of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen.

Outcome
trehalose in abundancee0
Qualifier
traces of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FTIR chromatogram further confirmed trehalose in abundance with traces of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LC-MS showed a single peak at retention time 3.78 min.

Outcome
single peake0
Value
3.78 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LC-MS profile with a single peak eluted with a retention time of 3.78 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–97 · show in text ↑

resistance inducer · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.