Abstract
A field experiment on lentil (Lens culinaris L.) was carried out during winter season (rabi) of 1992-93 and 1994-95 on deficient sandy loam soil. The growth yield of lentil was markedly improved with the application of sulphur up to 40 kg/ha with placement method, whereas up to 60 kg S/ha applied as broadcast with 2 irrigations. The grain yield increased by 64.8 and 55.1% with the application of 40 kg S/ha through placement and 60 kg S/ha through broadcast respectively. The maximum water-lise (19.3 cm) and water-usc efficiency (61.9 kg grain/cm/ha) was recorded with 40 kg S/ha. The water-lise was highest (25.2 cm) with 2 irrigation followed by 1 irrigation (18.8 cm) compared to rain fed (12.6 cm).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur placement up to 40 kg/ha markedly improved lentil growth and yield.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- application of sulphur up to 40 kg/ha with placement methode0
- Outcome
- growth yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth yield of lentil was markedly improved with the application of sulphur up to 40 kg/ha with placement method”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast sulfur up to 60 kg S/ha with two irrigations improved lentil growth and yield.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise0
- Treatment
- up to 60 kg S/ha applied as broadcast with 2 irrigationse0
- Outcome
- growth yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth yield of lentil was markedly improved with the application of sulphur up to 40 kg/ha with placement method, whereas up to 60 kg S/ha applied as broadcast with 2 irrigations”
Claim · model-written summary
Placement of 40 kg S/ha increased lentil grain yield by 64.8%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise1
- Treatment
- 40 kg S/ha through placemente0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 64.8 and 55.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield increased by 64.8 and 55.1% with the application of 40 kg S/ha through placement and 60 kg S/ha through broadcast respectively”
e1“growth yield of lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcast 60 kg S/ha increased lentil grain yield by 55.1%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise1
- Treatment
- 60 kg S/ha through broadcaste0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 55.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield increased by 64.8 and 55.1% with the application of 40 kg S/ha through placement and 60 kg S/ha through broadcast respectively”
e1“growth yield of lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
At 40 kg S/ha, maximum lentil water use was 19.3 cm.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum water-lise (19.3 cm) and water-usc efficiency (61.9 kg grain/cm/ha) was recorded with 40 kg S/ha”
e1“growth yield of lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
At 40 kg S/ha, maximum lentil water-use efficiency was 61.9 kg grain/cm/ha.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise1
- Treatment
- 40 kg S/hae0
- Outcome
- water-usc efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 61.9 kg grain/cm/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum water-lise (19.3 cm) and water-usc efficiency (61.9 kg grain/cm/ha) was recorded with 40 kg S/ha”
e1“growth yield of lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave the highest water use at 25.2 cm versus 18.8 cm with one irrigation and 12.6 cm rainfed.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise1
- Treatment
- 2 irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water-lisee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 25.2 cme0
- Qualifier
- 1 irrigation (18.8 cm)e0
- Comparator
- rain fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The water-lise was highest (25.2 cm) with 2 irrigation followed by 1 irrigation (18.8 cm) compared to rain fed (12.6 cm)”
e1“growth yield of lentil”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →transplanting · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.