Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Agronomy

Crops' Yield and Roots Response to Soil Phosphorus Distribution Resulting From Long-Term Soil and Phosphate Fertilization Management Strategies

Rafael de Souza Nunes; Djalma Martinhão Gomes de Sousa; Wenceslau J. Goedert; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We investigated labile P and roots distribution in the soil profile and their effect on phosphorus uptake and soybean and corn yield under different tillage systems and phosphate fertilization managements. In a long-term experiment fertilized with triple superphosphate (TSP) or reactive phosphate rock (RPR), where the fertilizer was band-applied in the crop row or broadcasted under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT), we evaluated labile P (Bray-1) and root density distribution in depth, and crop yield, biomass production and P uptake by soybean (16th crop) and corn (17th crop). The soil disturbance in CT promoted more homogeneous soil P distribution while in NT there was a strong gradient in depth, with nutrient accumulation in the fertilizer application zone. In general, the average content of P in the 0–20 cm layer was similar for the two soil management systems and for the two application methods, but higher for TSP in relation to RPR. Root distribution of soybeans in NT and corn in both tillage systems showed a strong relationship with soil P distribution. The production of biomass, P uptake and grain yield of soybean in CT was influenced by phosphate fertilization management and generally presented lower performance than in NT, what did not occur for corn possibly due to a better P uptake efficiency compared to that of soybean. Greater stratification on the distribution of soil P and soybean and corn roots in NT did not represent any limitation on the nutrient uptake and yield of these crops, not even in the extreme case where the fertilizer was continuously broadcast on the soil surface. The influence of soil tillage management and phosphate fertilization was more evident in soybeans than corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced more homogeneous soil P distribution than no-tillage.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
soil P distributione0
Direction
more homogeneouse0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil disturbance in CT promoted more homogeneous soil P distribution while in NT there was a strong gradient in depth, with nutrient accumulation in the fertilizer application zone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean and corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage produced a strong soil P depth gradient with accumulation in the application zone.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
soil P distributione0
Direction
strong gradient in depthe0
Qualifier
nutrient accumulation in the fertilizer application zonee0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil disturbance in CT promoted more homogeneous soil P distribution while in NT there was a strong gradient in depth, with nutrient accumulation in the fertilizer application zone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean and corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average soil P content in the 0–20 cm layer was similar across tillage and application methods.

Treatment
two soil management systems and for the two application methodse0
Outcome
average content of P in the 0–20 cm layere0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the average content of P in the 0–20 cm layer was similar for the two soil management systems and for the two application methods, but higher for TSP in relation to RPR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean and corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP yielded higher average soil P content than RPR.

Treatment
TSPe0
Outcome
average content of P in the 0–20 cm layere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
RPRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the average content of P in the 0–20 cm layer was similar for the two soil management systems and for the two application methods, but higher for TSP in relation to RPR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–962 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean and corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean root distribution under no-tillage strongly tracked soil P distribution.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Root distribution of soybeanse0
Setting
NTe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root distribution of soybeans in NT and corn in both tillage systems showed a strong relationship with soil P distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“strong relationship with soil P distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1085 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn root distribution in both tillage systems strongly tracked soil P distribution.

Outcome
corn in both tillage systemse0
Setting
both tillage systemse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root distribution of soybeans in NT and corn in both tillage systems showed a strong relationship with soil P distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“strong relationship with soil P distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate management influenced soybean biomass, P uptake and grain yield in conventional tillage; performance was generally lower than under no-tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
phosphate fertilization managemente0
Outcome
production of biomass, P uptake and grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The production of biomass, P uptake and grain yield of soybean in CT was influenced by phosphate fertilization management and generally presented lower performance than in NT, what did not occur for corn possibly due to a better P uptake efficiency compared to that of soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn did not show the lower conventional-tillage performance seen in soybean.

Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
did not occure0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The production of biomass, P uptake and grain yield of soybean in CT was influenced by phosphate fertilization management and generally presented lower performance than in NT, what did not occur for corn possibly due to a better P uptake efficiency compared to that of soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1364 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest corn may have better P uptake efficiency than soybean.

Outcome
P uptake efficiencye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
possiblye0
Comparator
soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“what did not occur for corn possibly due to a better P uptake efficiency compared to that of soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P and root stratification under no-tillage did not limit soybean and corn nutrient uptake or yield, even with continuous surface broadcasting.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
nutrient uptake and yielde0
Direction
did not represent any limitatione0
Qualifier
fertilizer was continuously broadcast on the soil surfacee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater stratification on the distribution of soil P and soybean and corn roots in NT did not represent any limitation on the nutrient uptake and yield of these crops, not even in the extreme case where the fertilizer was continuously broadcast on the soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and phosphate fertilization effects were more evident in soybean than corn.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soil tillage management and phosphate fertilizatione0
Outcome
influencee0
Direction
more evidente0
Comparator
corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of soil tillage management and phosphate fertilization was more evident in soybeans than corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1739 · show in text ↑

phosphate · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.