Paper · 2021 · Annals of Phytomedicine An International Journal

Effect of integrated diseases management (IDM) modules for the management of stripe rust of wheat

Arshad Husain; S.K. Biswas; Javed Bahar Khan; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is highly affected by stripe rust disease in northern India. Several management practices apply in wheat for the management of wheat rust; however, IDM practices are more effective. They reduced application of fungicide on wheat cultivation. Effect of IDM modules showed maximum shoot length as was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (32.05 cm) and (34.00 cm) and among all the treatments, maximum number of tillers were recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (2.89 and 3.00) during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. Among all these treatments, minimum disease severity was recorded in case of S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (5.33%) (9.13%) and (3.75%) at 80, 90, and 100 days after sowing, respectively during 2018-19. Soil application of Tirchoderma through FYM, seed treatment with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage also more effective against (81.87%) disease severity and was decrease over control. In case of disease incidence, minimum disease incidence against yellow rust of wheat was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (13.90%), (19.10%) and (21.21%) at 80, 90, and 100 days after sowing, respectively during 2019-20.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the IDM module of soil application of Trichoderma through FYM, seed treatment with Azotobactor and two zinc sprays gave the maximum shoot length (32.05 cm and 34.00 cm).

Treatment
S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Azotobactore0other
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
(32.05 cm) and (34.00 cm)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of IDM modules showed maximum shoot length as was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (32.05 cm) and (34.00 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“stripe rust of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the same IDM module gave the maximum number of tillers (2.89 in 2018-19 and 3.00 in 2019-20) among all treatments.

Treatment
S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Azotobactore0other
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
(2.89 and 3.00)e0
Qualifier
during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectivelye0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among all the treatments, maximum number of tillers were recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (2.89 and 3.00) during 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“stripe rust of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, soil application of Trichoderma through FYM, seed treatment with Azotobactor and two zinc sprays decreased disease severity by 81.87% relative to control.

Treatment
Soil application of Tirchoderma through FYM, seed treatment with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
stripe rustt0pathogen
Second interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
81.87%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of Tirchoderma through FYM, seed treatment with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage also more effective against (81.87%) disease severity and was decrease over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“stripe rust of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat in 2019-20, the same IDM module gave the minimum yellow rust disease incidence of 13.90% at 80 days after sowing.

Treatment
S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
yellow ruste0pathogen
Second interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
13.90%e0
Qualifier
during 2019-20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of disease incidence, minimum disease incidence against yellow rust of wheat was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (13.90%), (19.10%) and (21.21%) at 80, 90, and 100 days after sowing, respectively during 2019-20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat in 2019-20, the same IDM module gave the minimum yellow rust disease incidence of 19.10% at 90 days after sowing.

Treatment
S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
yellow ruste0pathogen
Second interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
19.10%e0
Qualifier
during 2019-20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of disease incidence, minimum disease incidence against yellow rust of wheat was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (13.90%), (19.10%) and (21.21%) at 80, 90, and 100 days after sowing, respectively during 2019-20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat in 2019-20, the same IDM module gave the minimum yellow rust disease incidence of 21.21% at 100 days after sowing.

Treatment
S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stagee0
Interactor
yellow ruste0pathogen
Second interactor
Tirchodermae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
21.21%e0
Qualifier
during 2019-20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of disease incidence, minimum disease incidence against yellow rust of wheat was recorded in S.A. of Tirchoderma through FYM, S.T. with Azotobactor, 2 Sprays of zinc; 1st was CRI stage, 2nd was booting stage, representing (13.90%), (19.10%) and (21.21%) at 80, 90, and 100 days after sowing, respectively during 2019-20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1605 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.