Paper · 2022 · Plants

The Effect of Cultivation Practices on Agronomic Performance, Elemental Composition and Isotopic Signature of Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)

Aleš Kolmanič; Lovro Sinkovič; Marijan Nečemer; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of cultivation practices on grain (oats) yield and yield components, such as straw yield, harvest index, thousand kernel weight, and plant lodging. In addition, multi-element composition and isotopic signature (δ13C, δ15N) of the oat grains were studied. The spring oat cultivar ‘Noni’ was grown in a long-term field experiment during 2015–2020, using three management practices: control without organic amendment, incorporation of manure every third year and incorporation of crop residues/cover crop in the rotation. Synthetic nitrogen (N) (0, 55, 110 and 165 kg/ha) was applied during oat development in each system. Multi-element analysis of mature grains from two consecutive years (2016 and 2017) was performed using EDXRF spectroscopy, while stable isotope ratios of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) were obtained using an elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA/IRMS). The results show how cultivation practices affect yield components and isotopic and elemental signatures. Increasing the N rate improved both the oat grain and straw yields and increased susceptibility to lodging. The results show how the elemental content (Si, Ca, Zn, Fe, Ti, Br and Rb) in the oat grains were influenced by intensification, and a noticeable decrease in elemental content at higher N rates was the result of a dilution effect of increased dry matter production. The mean δ15N values in oat grains ranged from 2.5‰ to 6.4‰ and decreased with increasing N rate, while δ13C values ranged from −29.9‰ to –28.9‰. Based on the δ15N values, it was possible to detect the addition of synthetic N above an N rate of 55 kg/ha, although it was impossible to differentiate between different management practices using stable isotopes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate improved oat grain yield.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
Increasing the N ratee0
Outcome
oat graine0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N rate improved both the oat grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate improved straw yield.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
Increasing the N ratee0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N rate improved both the oat grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate increased susceptibility to lodging.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
Increasing the N ratee0
Outcome
susceptibility to lodginge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N rate improved both the oat grain and straw yields and increased susceptibility to lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates decreased grain elemental content through dilution from dry matter production.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
higher N ratese0
Outcome
elemental content (Si, Ca, Zn, Fe, Ti, Br and Rb) in the oat grainse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
dilution effect of increased dry matter productione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elemental content (Si, Ca, Zn, Fe, Ti, Br and Rb) in the oat grains were influenced by intensification, and a noticeable decrease in elemental content at higher N rates was the result of a dilution effect of increased dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grain δ15N decreased as nitrogen rate increased, over a mean range of 2.5‰ to 6.4‰.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
δ15N values in oat grainse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.5‰ to 6.4‰e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean δ15N values in oat grains ranged from 2.5‰ to 6.4‰ and decreased with increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grain δ13C ranged from −29.9‰ to –28.9‰.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Outcome
δ13C valuese0
Value
−29.9‰ to –28.9‰e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“δ13C values ranged from −29.9‰ to –28.9‰”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain δ15N detected synthetic nitrogen addition above 55 kg/ha.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Outcome
detect the addition of synthetic Ne0
Value
55 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the δ15N values, it was possible to detect the addition of synthetic N above an N rate of 55 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stable isotopes could not distinguish management practices.

Taxon
Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)Avena sativat0
Outcome
differentiate between different management practicese0
Comparator
different management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was impossible to differentiate between different management practices using stable isotopes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.