Paper · 1993 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Yield Formation in Modern and Old Oat Cultivars under High and Low Nitrogen Regimes

P. Peltonen‐Sainio; M. Granqvist; A. Säynäjärvi

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Contribution of nitrogen (N) and plant breeding to yield formation of oats ( Avena sativa L.) was evaluated with two years'field experiments. These consisted of four Finnish oat cultivars released between 1935 and 1988 and one breeding line. Three rates of N application were used (0, 90, and 120 kg N ha −1 ) and 19 morpho‐physiological traits, including maturity class, plant structure and plant stand structure, were assessed. The modern cultivar out‐yielded the old one under low and high N, indicating that return of old varieties into cultivation under low‐input conditions is unlikely to be feasible. An oat ideotype for low productivity conditions must be characterized. Furthermore, N contributed more than oat breeding to several traits studies. However, in some cases N appeared to affect the traits measured in a negative manner. Use of N increased production of both above‐ground vegetative biomass and panicle weight without changing HI significantly. However, plant breeding slightly reduced the production of vegetative phytomass and increased the grain: straw ratio by 10 %. Moreover, genetic gains in shortening straw length, increasing lodging resistance, and improving BYDV tolerance were partly lost when high rates of N application were used. The contribution of N and oat breeding to other morpho‐physiological traits is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modern oat cultivar outyielded the old cultivar under both nitrogen regimes.

Material
modern cultivare0
Outcome
out‐yieldede0
Direction
out‐yieldede0
Qualifier
under low and high Ne0
Comparator
old onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The modern cultivar out‐yielded the old one under low and high N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased above-ground vegetative biomass production.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
above‐ground vegetative biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of N increased production of both above‐ground vegetative biomass and panicle weight without changing HI significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased panicle weight.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
panicle weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of N increased production of both above‐ground vegetative biomass and panicle weight without changing HI significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen did not significantly change harvest index.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
without changinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of N increased production of both above‐ground vegetative biomass and panicle weight without changing HI significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding slightly reduced vegetative phytomass production.

Material
plant breedinge0
Outcome
production of vegetative phytomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant breeding slightly reduced the production of vegetative phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1054 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breeding increased grain-to-straw ratio by 10%.

Material
plant breedinge1
Outcome
grain: straw ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the grain: straw ratio by 10 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant breeding slightly reduced the production of vegetative phytomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1054 · show in text ↑
e2

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen partly erased breeding gains in shorter straw length.

Treatment
high rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
shortening straw lengthe0
Direction
partly loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic gains in shortening straw length, increasing lodging resistance, and improving BYDV tolerance were partly lost when high rates of N application were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen partly erased breeding gains in lodging resistance.

Treatment
high rates of N applicatione0
Outcome
lodging resistancee0
Direction
partly loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic gains in shortening straw length, increasing lodging resistance, and improving BYDV tolerance were partly lost when high rates of N application were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen partly erased breeding gains in BYDV tolerance.

Treatment
high rates of N applicatione0
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse0pathogen
Outcome
BYDV tolerancee0
Direction
partly loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genetic gains in shortening straw length, increasing lodging resistance, and improving BYDV tolerance were partly lost when high rates of N application were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged return of old varieties under low-input conditions unlikely to be feasible.

Outcome
return of old varieties into cultivation under low‐input conditions is unlikely to be feasiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“return of old varieties into cultivation under low‐input conditions is unlikely to be feasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–615 · show in text ↑
e1

“oats ( Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–102 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 38 positive, 10 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.