Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Production

STUDIES ON STORAGE LIFE OF LE CONTE PEAR FRUITS

M. EL-Kady; N. Samra; E. EL-ERYAN

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was undertaken during the three successive seasons of 2003, 2004 and 2005 (the first season was a preliminary season to determine the best concentration of each material under study) on Le Cont pear fruits to evaluate the effect of using calcium chloride (CaCl2), carbendazime, potassium permanganate (KMnO4), hot water and ethanol treatments on fruit quality at harvest time and their effect on storage ability under cold storage at 0°C ±1 and through marketing for 3 days at room temperature after cold storage. From this study, the data revealed that dipping “Le Conte” pear fruits in CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3 % was effective for reducing loss in fruit weight percentage and progress fruit firmness while, carbendazime either at 750 or 1000 ppm reduced decayed fruits and total loss percentage in fruit weight. Moreover, ethanol vapour at 100 % enhanced SSC and SSC / acid ratio and progress carotenoids content, but decreased total acidity during cold storage. Furthermore, potassium permanganate kept carotenoids content to a long time and decreased total acidity during marketing. while, hot water at 52°C increased SSC / acid ratio in fruit juice which showed to increase marketing period of pear fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping pear fruits in CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3% reduced loss in fruit weight percentage.

Treatment
CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3 %e1
Outcome
loss in fruit weight percentagee1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3 % was effective for reducing loss in fruit weight percentage and progress fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping pear fruits in CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3% progressed fruit firmness.

Treatment
CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3 %e1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse1
Direction
progresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“CaCl2 solution at 2 or 3 % was effective for reducing loss in fruit weight percentage and progress fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazime at 750 or 1000 ppm reduced decayed fruits and total loss percentage in fruit weight.

Treatment
carbendazime either at 750 or 1000 ppme2
Outcome
decayed fruits and total loss percentage in fruit weighte2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e2

“carbendazime either at 750 or 1000 ppm reduced decayed fruits and total loss percentage in fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour at 100% enhanced SSC and SSC/acid ratio of pear fruit during cold storage.

Treatment
ethanol vapour at 100 %e3
Outcome
SSC and SSC / acid ratioe3
Direction
enhancede3
Setting
cold storagee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“ethanol vapour at 100 % enhanced SSC and SSC / acid ratio and progress carotenoids content, but decreased total acidity during cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour at 100% kept carotenoids content of pear fruit progressing during cold storage.

Treatment
ethanol vapour at 100 %e3
Outcome
carotenoids contente3
Direction
progresse3
Setting
cold storagee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“ethanol vapour at 100 % enhanced SSC and SSC / acid ratio and progress carotenoids content, but decreased total acidity during cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol vapour at 100% decreased total acidity of pear fruit during cold storage.

Treatment
ethanol vapour at 100 %e3
Outcome
total aciditye3
Direction
decreasede3
Setting
cold storagee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“ethanol vapour at 100 % enhanced SSC and SSC / acid ratio and progress carotenoids content, but decreased total acidity during cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium permanganate kept carotenoids content of pear fruit for a long time.

Treatment
potassium permanganatee4
Outcome
carotenoids contente4
Direction
kepte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“potassium permanganate kept carotenoids content to a long time and decreased total acidity during marketing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium permanganate decreased total acidity of pear fruit during marketing.

Treatment
potassium permanganatee4
Outcome
total aciditye4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e4

“potassium permanganate kept carotenoids content to a long time and decreased total acidity during marketing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water at 52°C increased the SSC/acid ratio of pear fruit juice.

Treatment
hot water at 52°Ce5
Outcome
SSC/acid ratio in fruit juicee5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“hot water at 52°C increased SSC/acid ratio in fruit juice which showed to increase marketing period of pear fruits”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot water at 52°C increased the marketing period of pear fruits.

Treatment
hot water at 52°Ce5
Outcome
marketing period of pear fruitse5
Direction
increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEAR FRUITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
e5

“hot water at 52°C increased SSC/acid ratio in fruit juice which showed to increase marketing period of pear fruits”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1105–1221 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.