Paper · 2021 · Technical and technological aspects of development and testing of new machinery and technologies for agriculture of Ukraine

Tillage and Plant Density as Measures of Adaptation to Climate Change

South-Ukrainian branch of L. Pogorilyy UkrNDIPVT; V. Malyarchuk; E. Fedorchuk

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. The article presents the results of research of the South-Ukrainian branch of UkrNDIPVT L. Pogoriloho on the adaptation of winter wheat cultivation technologies in grain and steam crop rotations to increase the aridity of the climate by optimizing the density of standing plants, methods and depth of basic tillage. The purpose of research is to adjust the seeding rate by changing the width of the rows when growing winter wheat, as an agro-technological measure of accumulation and rational use of soil moisture (agro-technological direction of adaptation to climate change). Determining the influence of sowing rate, with different methods of tillage, on the productivity and economic efficiency of growing winter wheat in crop rotations on non-irrigated lands of southern Ukraine. Methods and Materials: field, quantitative-weight, visual and laboratory methods. Mathematical and statistical methods were used to systematize and generalize the obtained results. Research results. It has been experimentally established that the replacement of plowing to a depth of 28-30 cm for winter wheat crops with shallow (10-12 cm) disc tillage and reduction of the sowing rate of winter wheat variety «Kherson-99» to 2.25 million pieces similar seeds per hectare, by increasing the width between rows, provided an increase in grain yield by 16.7 % in 2020 and 7.7% in 2021. The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021, which is 18.4 % and 9.3 % more than similar indicators in deep plowing and 31.3 % and 8.9 % more than the classic sowing rate (4.5 million units/ha). Conclusions. The efficiency of replacing deep plowing with shallow disc loosening and reducing the sowing rate to 2.25 million units/ha in the cultivation of winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine was confirmed. A regularity in the size of the effect of reducing the seeding rate under drier conditions of the growing season was revealed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage and reduced seeding raised grain yield 16.7% in 2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
«Kherson-99»e0
Treatment
shallow (10-12 cm) disc tillage and reduction of the sowing rate of winter wheat variety «Kherson-99» to 2.25 million pieces similar seeds per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.7 %e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
plowing to a depth of 28-30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“replacement of plowing to a depth of 28-30 cm for winter wheat crops with shallow (10-12 cm) disc tillage and reduction of the sowing rate of winter wheat variety «Kherson-99» to 2.25 million pieces similar seeds per hectare, by increasing the width between rows, provided an increase in grain yield by 16.7 % in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same changes raised grain yield 7.7% in 2021.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
shallow (10-12 cm) disc tillage and reduction of the sowing rate of winter wheat variety «Kherson-99» to 2.25 million pieces similar seeds per hectaree0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.7%e0
Qualifier
2021e0
Comparator
plowing to a depth of 28-30 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“replacement of plowing to a depth of 28-30 cm for winter wheat crops with shallow (10-12 cm) disc tillage and reduction of the sowing rate of winter wheat variety «Kherson-99» to 2.25 million pieces similar seeds per hectare, by increasing the width between rows, provided an increase in grain yield by 16.7 % in 2020 and 7.7% in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The technology produced UAH 13280,5 profit per hectare in 2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Value
UAH 13280,5e0
Qualifier
2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The technology produced UAH 28484,9 profit per hectare in 2021.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Value
UAH 28484,9e0
Qualifier
2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit exceeded deep plowing by 18.4% in 2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
this technologye0
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Direction
moree0
Value
18.4 %e0
Comparator
deep plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021, which is 18.4 % and 9.3 % more than similar indicators in deep plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit exceeded deep plowing by 9.3% in 2021.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
this technologye0
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Direction
moree0
Value
9.3 %e0
Comparator
deep plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021, which is 18.4 % and 9.3 % more than similar indicators in deep plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit exceeded classic sowing rate by 31.3% in 2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
this technologye0
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Direction
moree0
Value
31.3 %e0
Comparator
classic sowing ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021, which is 18.4 % and 9.3 % more than similar indicators in deep plowing and 31.3 % and 8.9 % more than the classic sowing rate (4.5 million units/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit exceeded classic sowing rate by 8.9% in 2021.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
this technologye0
Outcome
profit per 1 hectaree0
Direction
moree0
Value
8.9 %e0
Comparator
classic sowing ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The profit per 1 hectare with this technology amounted to UAH 13280,5 in 2020 and UAH 28484,9 in 2021, which is 18.4 % and 9.3 % more than similar indicators in deep plowing and 31.3 % and 8.9 % more than the classic sowing rate (4.5 million units/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding-rate reduction had a different effect under drier growing seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
reducing the seeding ratee0
Outcome
size of the effecte0
Qualifier
drier conditions of the growing seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A regularity in the size of the effect of reducing the seeding rate under drier conditions of the growing season was revealed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tillage and Plant Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat Kherson-99 in grain and steam crop rotation of the South of Ukraine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1869 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.