Paper · 2021 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira

Maturation of 'Baigent' apples protected by anti-hail nets and sprayed with aminoethoxyvinylglycine and ethephon

Cristina Soethe; Cristiano André Steffens; Fernando José Hawerroth; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of pre-harvest spraying with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and ethephon on fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees grown under black anti-hail nets. The treatments were: control; 125 mg L-1 AVG, sprayed 30 days before anticipated harvest time (DBAH); 120 mg L-1 ethephon 7 DBAH; 62.5 mg L-1 + 62.5 mg L-1 AVG 30 and 20 DBAH; and 62.5 mg L-1 + 62.5 mg L-1 AVG 30 and 20 DBAH + 120 mg L-1 ethephon 7 DBAH. Fruit were harvested in the commercial harvest of the control treatment (harvest 1) and 14 days later (harvest 2). Yellowing and loss of firmness were delayed by the treatments with AVG and accelerated by that with ethephon. AVG application in a single rate of 125 mg L-1 30 DBAH or in two split rates of 62.5 mg L-1 30 and 20 DBAH delays fruit maturation. The pre-harvest application of AVG in a single rate reduces the red color of the fruits, which is not affected by application in split rates, combined or not with ethephon, regardless of the date of harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG delayed fruit yellowing and firmness loss.

Treatment
AVGe0
Outcome
Yellowing and loss of firmnesse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellowing and loss of firmness were delayed by the treatments with AVG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon accelerated fruit yellowing and firmness loss.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
Yellowing and loss of firmnesse0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellowing and loss of firmness were delayed by the treatments with AVG and accelerated by that with ethephon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single AVG rate delayed fruit maturation.

Treatment
single rate of 125 mg L-1 30 DBAHe0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
delayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG application in a single rate of 125 mg L-1 30 DBAH or in two split rates of 62.5 mg L-1 30 and 20 DBAH delays fruit maturation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two split AVG rates delayed fruit maturation.

Treatment
two split rates of 62.5 mg L-1 30 and 20 DBAHe0
Outcome
fruit maturatione0
Direction
delayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG application in a single rate of 125 mg L-1 30 DBAH or in two split rates of 62.5 mg L-1 30 and 20 DBAH delays fruit maturation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single preharvest AVG rate reduced fruit red color.

Treatment
AVG in a single ratee0
Outcome
red color of the fruitse0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest application of AVG in a single rate reduces the red color of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split AVG rates did not affect fruit red color regardless of harvest date.

Treatment
application in split ratese0
Outcome
red color of the fruitse1
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
regardless of the date of harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which is not affected by application in split rates, combined or not with ethephon, regardless of the date of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“red color of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–931 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split AVG rates combined with ethephon did not affect fruit red color regardless of harvest date.

Treatment
application in split rates, combined or not with ethephone0
Outcome
red color of the fruitse1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which is not affected by application in split rates, combined or not with ethephon, regardless of the date of harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“red color of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–931 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit maturation of 'Baigent' apple (Malus domestica) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–197 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.