Paper · 2022 · Applied Food Research

Quality of ‘Baigent’ apples as a function of pre-harvest application of aminoethoxyvinylglycine and ethephon stored in controlled atmosphere

Cristina Soethe; Cristiano André Steffens; Fernando José Hawerroth; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

– The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of pre-harvest application on ‘Baigent’ apple trees cultivated under black anti-hail nets with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), in a single or split dose, combined or not with ethephon, on the quality, the antioxidant activity, and the content of phenolic compounds of the fruits after storage in controlled atmosphere (CA). The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks, maintaining high flesh firmness, texture attributes, and fruit acidity, without causing negative effects on the incidence of mealiness and decay. The pre-harvest applications of AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 and in split dose combined with ethephon also contributed to the reduction of the ethylene production rate and yellowing, showed high flesh firmness and texture, however, it showed a high incidence of decay and cracking when ethephon was combined with AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1. In the skin, application of AVG only at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 reduced the total phenolic compounds values, however, total antioxidant activity was reduced with any form of AVG application. In the flesh, there was no effect of pre-harvest application of AVG. Regardless of the dose and form of application, AVG reduced the contents of chlorogenic acid, phloridizin, and epicatechin in the skin of fruits harvested at commercial harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG alone reduced ethylene production, yellowing and cracking.

Material
‘Baigent’t0
Treatment
AVG alonee0
Outcome
rate of ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks, maintaining high flesh firmness, texture attributes, and fruit acidity, without causing negative effects on the incidence of mealiness and decay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG alone produced less yellowing and lower cracking incidence.

Material
‘Baigent’t0
Treatment
AVG alonee0
Outcome
yellowing fruitse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG alone lowered cracking incidence.

Material
‘Baigent’t0
Treatment
AVG alonee0
Outcome
incidence of crackse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG alone maintained high firmness, texture and acidity.

Material
‘Baigent’t0
Treatment
AVG alonee0
Outcome
flesh firmness, texture attributes, and fruit aciditye0
Direction
maintaining highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks, maintaining high flesh firmness, texture attributes, and fruit acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG alone caused no negative effects on mealiness and decay incidence.

Treatment
AVG alonee0
Outcome
incidence of mealiness and decaye0
Direction
without causing negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG alone, both at a dose of 0.125 g L−1, as well as in split dose and at a dose of 0.0625 g L−1, reduced the rate of ethylene production, showed less yellowing fruits and a lower incidence of cracks, maintaining high flesh firmness, texture attributes, and fruit acidity, without causing negative effects on the incidence of mealiness and decay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG combined with ethephon reduced ethylene production and yellowing.

Treatment
AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 and in split dose combined with ethephone0
Outcome
ethylene production rate and yellowinge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 and in split dose combined with ethephon also contributed to the reduction of the ethylene production rate and yellowing, showed high flesh firmness and texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG combined with ethephon yielded high firmness and texture.

Treatment
AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 and in split dose combined with ethephone0
Outcome
flesh firmness and texturee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pre-harvest applications of AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 and in split dose combined with ethephon also contributed to the reduction of the ethylene production rate and yellowing, showed high flesh firmness and texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon with 0.125 g L−1 AVG produced high decay and cracking incidence.

Treatment
ethephon was combined with AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1e0
Outcome
incidence of decay and crackinge0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed a high incidence of decay and cracking when ethephon was combined with AVG at a dose of 0.125 g L−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG at 0.125 g L−1 reduced skin total phenolics.

Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
AVG only at a dose of 0.125 g L−1e0
Outcome
total phenolic compounds valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the skin, application of AVG only at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 reduced the total phenolic compounds values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every AVG application form reduced total antioxidant activity in skin.

Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
any form of AVG applicatione0
Outcome
total antioxidant activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the skin, application of AVG only at a dose of 0.125 g L−1 reduced the total phenolic compounds values, however, total antioxidant activity was reduced with any form of AVG application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest AVG had no effect in apple flesh.

Organ / stage
fleshe0
Treatment
pre-harvest application of AVGe0
Outcome
no effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the flesh, there was no effect of pre-harvest application of AVG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG reduced skin chlorogenic acid, phloridizin and epicatechin at commercial harvest regardless of dose or application form.

Organ / stage
skine0
Treatment
AVGe0
Outcome
contents of chlorogenic acid, phloridizin, and epicatechine0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Regardless of the dose and form of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the dose and form of application, AVG reduced the contents of chlorogenic acid, phloridizin, and epicatechin in the skin of fruits harvested at commercial harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Baigent’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–27 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.