Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Agronomy

A Bacterial Consortium and Synthetic Fertilizer Based Biocontrol Approach Against Potato Rot Disease “Neocosmospora rubicola”

Muhammad Riaz; Rashid Mahmood; Mohammed Antar; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conventional management of stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola , through fungicide application is an environmentally unfavorable practice that calls for an alternative biocontrol approach. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are known to not only promote plant growth but also control diseases caused by various fungi. The study was designed to evaluate the potential of three strains of PGPB and synthetic fertilizer to manage stem rot of potatoes. In the first experiment, PGPB strains Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum , and Pseudomonas putida and their combinations were evaluated on PDA medium against N. rubicola using the dual culture technique. All three bacterial strains were found effective in reducing the radial growth of the fungus maximum up to 91%. In the second experiment, in the presence of half and full recommended doses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), the potato growing medium was inoculated with N. rubicola alone, and with combinations of N. rubicola and PGPB strains (bacterial formulation; BF). N. rubicola increased stem and tuber rot, and decreased tuber weight by 11% compared to the control. On the other hand, sole inoculation with BF significantly increased tuber weight. In addition, a combined inoculation of N. rubicola and BF, or N. rubicola inoculation a week prior to BF inoculation did not affect tuber weight compared to control. However, inoculation of BF a week prior to N. rubicola , controlled rot symptoms and increased tuber weight by 32%. An increase in P application favored the PGPB strains in controlling rot in tubers. The interaction effect of fertilizer N with the inoculation combinations was non-significant; however, the main impact of N was to increase rot in tubers and decrease in potato stems. Hence a prerequisite application of PGPB formulation proved to be an effective tool against N. rubicola infestation in potatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each bacterial strain reduced pathogen radial growth on PDA by as much as 91%.

Treatment
bacterial strainse0e1
Interactor
funguse0e1pathogen
Outcome
radial growth of the funguse0e1
Direction
reducinge0e1
Value
91%e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three bacterial strains were found effective in reducing the radial growth of the fungus maximum up to 91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. rubicola increased potato stem rot.

Treatment
N. rubicolae0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Outcome
stem rote0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. rubicola increased stem and tuber rot, and decreased tuber weight by 11% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. rubicola increased potato tuber rot.

Treatment
N. rubicolae0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Outcome
tuber rote0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. rubicola increased stem and tuber rot, and decreased tuber weight by 11% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N. rubicola reduced tuber weight by 11% versus control.

Treatment
N. rubicolae0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Outcome
tuber weighte0e1
Direction
decreasede0e1
Value
11%e0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. rubicola increased stem and tuber rot, and decreased tuber weight by 11% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial formulation alone significantly increased tuber weight.

Treatment
sole inoculation with BFe0e1
Interactor
BFe0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber weighte0e1
Direction
increasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole inoculation with BF significantly increased tuber weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous pathogen and BF inoculation did not affect tuber weight versus control.

Treatment
combined inoculation of N. rubicola and BFe0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Second interactor
BFe0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber weighte0e1
Direction
did not affecte0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combined inoculation of N. rubicola and BF, or N. rubicola inoculation a week prior to BF inoculation did not affect tuber weight compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation one week before BF did not affect tuber weight versus control.

Treatment
N. rubicola inoculation a week prior to BF inoculatione0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Second interactor
BFe0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber weighte0e1
Direction
did not affecte0e1
Comparator
controle0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N. rubicola inoculation a week prior to BF inoculation did not affect tuber weight compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF one week before pathogen inoculation controlled rot symptoms.

Treatment
inoculation of BF a week prior to N. rubicolae0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Second interactor
BFe0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rot symptomse0e1
Direction
controllede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of BF a week prior to N. rubicola , controlled rot symptoms and increased tuber weight by 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1542 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF one week before pathogen inoculation increased tuber weight by 32%.

Treatment
inoculation of BF a week prior to N. rubicolae0e1
Interactor
N. rubicola[Neocosmospora] rubicolae0e1pathogen
Second interactor
BFe0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber weighte0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Value
32%e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of BF a week prior to N. rubicola , controlled rot symptoms and increased tuber weight by 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1542 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More phosphorus application favored bacterial control of tuber rot.

Treatment
increase in P applicatione0e1
Interactor
PGPB strainse0e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controlling rot in tuberse0e1
Direction
favorede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in P application favored the PGPB strains in controlling rot in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1626 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and inoculation combination interaction was nonsignificant.

Treatment
fertilizer Ne0e1
Outcome
interaction effecte0e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of fertilizer N with the inoculation combinations was non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1720 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased tuber rot.

Treatment
Ne0e1
Outcome
rot in tuberse0e1
Direction
increasee0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the main impact of N was to increase rot in tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1781 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen decreased stem rot.

Treatment
Ne0e1
Outcome
potato stemse0e1
Direction
decreasee0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in potato stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1810 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem rot disease of potato, caused by Neocosmospora rubicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–87 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

113 papers: 53 positive, 60 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.