Paper · 2022 · South African Journal of Botany

The effect of adjusting fruit loading by pruning on the yield and quality of sweet pepper in low light conditions

Farinaz Parniani; Maryam Haghighi; Seyed Ahmad Mireei

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Pruning and light quality and quantity can affect the fruit load, fruit shape, nutritional value, and quality of sweet pepper. The experiment was arranged as a split-plot conducted in a randomized block design. Treatments consisted of keeping 3, 5, and 7 fruits on the bush, and having un-pruned (P3, P5, and P7 Pnon=without pruning) sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L., cv. Lumos) with 3 replications. Two greenhouses including 14,000 for the full-light one and 6000-Lux for the low one were designed. The results showed that carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation were highly related to light, with a significant effect in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one. Leaves carbohydrate content was raised in P3 and P5 for both greenhouses and this was more significant in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one. TSS was higher in full light with pruning (P3, P5, P7); the highest TSS in the low-light greenhouse was seen in P3. Phenol, antioxidant, vitamin C, and organic acid were higher in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one. Conclusively, pruning was more effective on weight after increased growth of bush in the second or third harvest. Longer shape and less flushing are favored by pepper producers. This can be achieved in the full light greenhouse with P3 and then P5 pruning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation were significantly greater under full light than low light.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
full light greenhousee0
Outcome
carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulatione0
Comparator
low onee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation were highly related to light, with a significant effect in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 and P5 raised leaf carbohydrate content in both greenhouses, more strongly under full light.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
P3 and P5e0
Outcome
Leaves carbohydrate contente0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
both greenhousese0
Comparator
low onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves carbohydrate content was raised in P3 and P5 for both greenhouses and this was more significant in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS was higher under full light with P3, P5 and P7 pruning.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
pruning (P3, P5, P7)e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
highere0
Setting
full lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS was higher in full light with pruning (P3, P5, P7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 gave the highest TSS in the low-light greenhouse.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
P3e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
low-light greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest TSS in the low-light greenhouse was seen in P3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenol, antioxidant and vitamin C were higher under full light than low light.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
full light greenhousee0
Outcome
Phenol, antioxidant, vitamin Ce0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenol, antioxidant, vitamin C, and organic acid were higher in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic acid was higher under full light than low light.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
full light greenhousee0
Outcome
organic acide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic acid were higher in the full light greenhouse, as compared with the low one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning had a greater effect on weight after bush growth increased in the second or third harvest.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
second or third harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pruning was more effective on weight after increased growth of bush in the second or third harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend P3 followed by P5 pruning under full light to obtain a longer shape and less flushing.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
P3 and then P5 pruninge0
Outcome
Longer shape and less flushinge0
Direction
Longere0
Setting
full light greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer shape and less flushing are favored by pepper producers. This can be achieved in the full light greenhouse with P3 and then P5 pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.