Paper · 2022 · Biosystems Diversity

Composition of pigment complex in leaves of soybean plants, inoculated by Bradyrhizobium japonicum, subject to metal nanocarboxylates and various-levels of water supply

S. Y. Kots; L. I. Rybachenko; A. V. Khrapova; et al.

15
claims
35
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A distinctive feature of legumes is the ability to combine two most important processes: photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation. However, the course of those processes, and therefore seed potential of those crops depend on a number of biotic and abiotic factors, the commonest being drought. Therefore, interest in physical-biochemical resistance of the plant organism to abiotic stress factors is increasing, as well as search for optimum ways to increase its adaptability. Success of adaptation of a plant’s organism to unfavourable environmental factors is known to largely depend on optimal functioning of assimilative apparatus. Some indicators of the condition of the apparatus are the content and ratio of photosynthesis pigments. Therefore, we aimed at determining the reaction of the pigment complex of Glycine max (L.) Merr. plants, grown against the background of optimal and insufficient watering, to inoculation of seeds with rhizobia bacteria Bradyrhizobium japonicum, cultivated using nanocarboxylates of chromium, cobalt, iron, copper and germanium. Research has shown that utilization of germanium nanocarboxylate as a component of inoculative suspension led to the highest content of chlorophylls in leaves of soybean of the studied variants in the blossoming phase during optimal watering, as well as significant increase in the content of carotenoids compared with the control plants regardless of the level of watering. At the same time, this element caused no significant effect on the chlorophyll content in plants grown in drought. It was confirmed that among soybean plants that were in stress conditions (blossoming phase) for two weeks, the highest content of chlorophylls was in leaves of plants grown from seeds inoculated with rhizobial suspension with addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control. Furthermore, chromium and copper nanocarboxylates stimulated the content of carotenoids in the same plants, though it was less expressed than after adding germanium nanocarboxylate. The highest content of photosynthetic pigments in plants after the watering was resumed (phase of bean formation) was in cases of applying chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates. It was confirmed that the most efficient way to protect the pigment complex of soybean plants during drought was using chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates as components of inoculation suspension. The results we obtained indicate the possibility of applying chromium nanocarboxylate in the technology of cultivating soybean in the conditions of water deficiency as an effective way to improve biosynthesis of chlorophylls, as well as using germanium nanocarboxyllate as a component that provides a high level of activity of protective mechanisms of the pigment system of soybean, associated with resisting stress caused by water deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germanium nanocarboxylate gave the highest leaf chlorophyll content during blossoming with optimal watering.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
germanium nanocarboxylatee0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicume1symbiont
Outcome
content of chlorophyllse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
during optimal wateringe0
Comparator
studied variantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“utilization of germanium nanocarboxylate as a component of inoculative suspension led to the highest content of chlorophylls in leaves of soybean of the studied variants in the blossoming phase during optimal watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1305 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bradyrhizobium japonicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germanium nanocarboxylate significantly increased carotenoid content versus control regardless of watering level.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
germanium nanocarboxylatee1
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicume2symbiont
Outcome
content of carotenoidse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
regardless of the level of wateringe0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in the content of carotenoids compared with the control plants regardless of the level of watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“utilization of germanium nanocarboxylate as a component of inoculative suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1169 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bradyrhizobium japonicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germanium nanocarboxylate had no significant effect on chlorophyll content under drought.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
germanium nanocarboxylatee1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Qualifier
grown in droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this element caused no significant effect on the chlorophyll content in plants grown in drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1552 · show in text ↑
e1

“utilization of germanium nanocarboxylate as a component of inoculative suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium nanocarboxylate raised chlorophyll a by 25.3% in stressed blossoming soybeans versus control.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
chlorophyll аe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25.3%e0
Qualifier
in stress conditions (blossoming phase) for two weekse1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
e1

“in stress conditions (blossoming phase) for two weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanocarboxylate raised chlorophyll a by 22.8% in stressed blossoming soybeans versus control.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
copper nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
chlorophyll аe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium nanocarboxylate raised chlorophyll b by 29.4% versus control under stress.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanocarboxylate raised chlorophyll b by 32.3% versus control under stress.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
copper nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium nanocarboxylate raised combined chlorophylls by 26.4%% versus control.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.4%%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanocarboxylate raised combined chlorophylls by 23.8% versus control.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
copper nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of chromium and copper nanocarboxylates, which caused 25.3% and 22.8% increase in chlorophyll а, 29.4% and 32.3% in chlorophyll b and 26.4%% and 23.8% in them respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium nanocarboxylate stimulated carotenoid content, less than germanium nanocarboxylate.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
content of carotenoidse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
germanium nanocarboxylatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromium and copper nanocarboxylates stimulated the content of carotenoids in the same plants, though it was less expressed than after adding germanium nanocarboxylate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2170 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper nanocarboxylate stimulated carotenoid content, less than germanium nanocarboxylate.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
copper nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
content of carotenoidse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
germanium nanocarboxylatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromium and copper nanocarboxylates stimulated the content of carotenoids in the same plants, though it was less expressed than after adding germanium nanocarboxylate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2170 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromium nanocarboxylate produced the highest photosynthetic pigment content after watering resumed.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after the watering was resumede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest content of photosynthetic pigments in plants after the watering was resumed (phase of bean formation) was in cases of applying chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2172–2351 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germanium nanocarboxylate produced the highest photosynthetic pigment content after watering resumed.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
germanium nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
content of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after the watering was resumede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest content of photosynthetic pigments in plants after the watering was resumed (phase of bean formation) was in cases of applying chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2172–2351 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded chromium nanocarboxylate was among the most efficient pigment protection components during drought.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chromiume0
Outcome
protect the pigment complexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most efficient way to protect the pigment complex of soybean plants during drought was using chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates as components of inoculation suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2550 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded germanium nanocarboxylate was among the most efficient pigment protection components during drought.

Taxon
soybean plantsGlycine maxt0
Treatment
germanium nanocarboxylatese0
Outcome
protect the pigment complexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most efficient way to protect the pigment complex of soybean plants during drought was using chromium and germanium nanocarboxylates as components of inoculation suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2550 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–58 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

germanium atom · Bradyrhizobium japonicum · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · Bradyrhizobium japonicum · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.