Paper · 2022 · Journal of Agricultural Studies

Weed Dynamics and Yield of Cowpea Inoculated in Mulching (Crushed Capoeira)

Tácila Rayene dos Santos Marinho; Régilla Martins Feitosa dos Reis; Luiz Júnior Pereira Marques; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mulching (crushing capoeira) is an alternative system for the use of fire for cultivation in the Northern region of Brazil. Cowpea is considered an important food crop in this region; however, weeds might limit its productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the population dynamics of weeds and the productivity of cowpea with different habit of growth inoculated with Bradyrhizobium sp in mulching. The experiment was carried out in randomized blocks with the cultivars BRS Guariba and BR 17 Gurgueia, with and without inoculation of Bradyrhizobium sp and nitrogen fertilization as a control. Twenty-seven species and three genera of weeds were identified, distributed into 12 botanical families in the BRS Guariba cultivar and 25 species in ten families in BR 17 Gurgueia cultivar. The results revealed that the significative species were Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers, Cyperus sp, Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & Cham, and Spermacoce verticillata L. Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp reduced the infestation of the most important species and presented higher productivity (1965.09 kg ha-1) than the treatment without inoculation (987.14 kg ha-1). The growth habit of cowpea cultivars in mulching (crushing capoeira) system did not affect crop yield, but longer studies are needed to validate the information obtained.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Guariba plots contained 27 weed species and three genera in 12 families.

Material
BRS Guaribae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
species and three genera of weedse0
Value
Twenty-seven speciese0
Qualifier
12 botanical familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty-seven species and three genera of weeds were identified, distributed into 12 botanical families in the BRS Guariba cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 17 Gurgueia plots contained 25 weed species in ten families.

Material
BR 17 Gurgueiae0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
speciese0
Value
25 speciese0
Qualifier
ten familiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 species in ten families in BR 17 Gurgueia cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vismia guianensis was identified as a significant weed species.

Interactor
Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) PersVismia guianensise0weed
Outcome
significative speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vismia guianensis
Vismia guianensis · InteractorJoão Medeiros · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significative species were Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers, Cyperus sp, Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & Cham, and Spermacoce verticillata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyperus sp was identified as a significant weed species.

Interactor
Cyperus spCyperuse0weed
Outcome
significative speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus
Cyperus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Miwasatoshi · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significative species were Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers, Cyperus sp, Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & Cham, and Spermacoce verticillata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scleria melaleuca was identified as a significant weed species.

Interactor
Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & ChamScleria gaertnerie0weed
Outcome
significative speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significative species were Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers, Cyperus sp, Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & Cham, and Spermacoce verticillata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spermacoce verticillata was identified as a significant weed species.

Interactor
Spermacoce verticillata L.Scleromitrion verticillatume0weed
Outcome
significative speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scleromitrion verticillatum
Scleromitrion verticillatum · InteractorEdward Steven · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significative species were Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers, Cyperus sp, Scleria melaleuca Rchb. ex Schltdl. & Cham, and Spermacoce verticillata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation reduced infestation by the most important weeds.

Treatment
Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spe0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium spBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
infestation of the most important speciese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp reduced the infestation of the most important species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium inoculation yielded 1965.09 kg ha-1, compared with 987.14 kg ha-1 without inoculation.

Treatment
Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium spe0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium spBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1965.09 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
987.14 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
treatment without inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp reduced the infestation of the most important species and presented higher productivity (1965.09 kg ha-1) than the treatment without inoculation (987.14 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea cultivar growth habit did not affect yield in the mulching system.

Material
cowpea cultivarse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
mulching (crushing capoeira) systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth habit of cowpea cultivars in mulching (crushing capoeira) system did not affect crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1259 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.