Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Surgery

Multimodality liver directed treatment for colorectal liver metastasis: Array of complementary options can yield improved outcomes a south Asian single center experience

Amit Chopde; Nitin Shetty; Shraddha Patkar; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grain zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) concentrations and their responses to foliar application of micronutrients in 28 Chinese wheat landraces and 63 cultivars were investigated in a two-year field experiment. The average grain Zn and Fe concentrations were 41.8 mg kg−1 (29.0−63.3 mg kg−1) and 39.7 mg kg−1 (27.9−67.0 mg kg−1), respectively. Compared with cultivars, landraces had greater grain Zn (11.0%) and Fe (4.8%) concentrations but lower harvest index (HI), grain weight per spike (GWS), grain number per spike (GNS) and thousand grain weight (TGW). Both Zn and Fe concentrations were negatively and significantly correlated with HI, GWS, and GNS, while showed a poor association with TGW, suggesting that lower HI, GWS, and GNS, but not TGW, accounted for higher Zn and Fe concentrations for landraces than for cultivars. Grain Zn concentrations of both cultivars and landraces significantly increased after foliar Zn spray and the increase was two-fold greater for landraces (12.6 mg kg−1) than for cultivars (6.4 mg kg−1). Foliar Fe spray increased grain Fe concentrations of landraces (3.4 mg kg−1) and cultivars (1.2 mg kg−1), but these increases were not statistically significant. This study showed that Chinese wheat landraces had higher grain Zn and Fe concentrations than cultivars, and greater increases occurred in grain Zn concentration than in grain Fe concentration in response to fertilization, suggesting that Chinese wheat landraces could serve as a potential genetic source for enhancing grain mineral levels in modern wheat cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean wheat grain zinc concentration was 41.8 mg kg−1.

Outcome
grain Zne0
Value
41.8 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average grain Zn and Fe concentrations were 41.8 mg kg−1 (29.0−63.3 mg kg−1) and 39.7 mg kg−1 (27.9−67.0 mg kg−1), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–333 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean wheat grain iron concentration was 39.7 mg kg−1.

Outcome
Fe concentrationse0
Value
39.7 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average grain Zn and Fe concentrations were 41.8 mg kg−1 (29.0−63.3 mg kg−1) and 39.7 mg kg−1 (27.9−67.0 mg kg−1), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–333 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces had 11.0% greater grain zinc concentration than cultivars.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
grain Zne0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11.0%e0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with cultivars, landraces had greater grain Zn (11.0%) and Fe (4.8%) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces had 4.8% greater grain iron concentration than cultivars.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4.8%e0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with cultivars, landraces had greater grain Zn (11.0%) and Fe (4.8%) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Landraces had lower harvest index, grain weight and number per spike, and thousand grain weight.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
harvest index (HI), grain weight per spike (GWS), grain number per spike (GNS) and thousand grain weight (TGW)e0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“landraces had greater grain Zn (11.0%) and Fe (4.8%) concentrations but lower harvest index (HI), grain weight per spike (GWS), grain number per spike (GNS) and thousand grain weight (TGW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc and iron concentrations were negatively correlated with harvest index, grain weight per spike and grain number per spike.

Outcome
Zn and Fe concentrationse0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
HI, GWS, and GNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both Zn and Fe concentrations were negatively and significantly correlated with HI, GWS, and GNS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–646 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc and iron concentrations had a poor association with thousand grain weight.

Outcome
poor associatione0
Comparator
TGWe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while showed a poor association with TGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly raised grain zinc in landraces by 12.6 mg kg−1.

Material
landracese0
Treatment
foliar Zn spraye0
Outcome
Grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.6 mg kg−1e0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain Zn concentrations of both cultivars and landraces significantly increased after foliar Zn spray and the increase was two-fold greater for landraces (12.6 mg kg−1) than for cultivars (6.4 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly raised grain zinc in cultivars by 6.4 mg kg−1.

Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
foliar Zn spraye0
Outcome
Grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.4 mg kg−1e0
Comparator
landracese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain Zn concentrations of both cultivars and landraces significantly increased after foliar Zn spray and the increase was two-fold greater for landraces (12.6 mg kg−1) than for cultivars (6.4 mg kg−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron raised landrace grain iron by 3.4 mg kg−1 without statistical significance.

Material
landracese0
Treatment
Foliar Fe spraye0
Outcome
grain Fe concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.4 mg kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Fe spray increased grain Fe concentrations of landraces (3.4 mg kg−1) and cultivars (1.2 mg kg−1), but these increases were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron raised cultivar grain iron by 1.2 mg kg−1 without statistical significance.

Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
Foliar Fe spraye0
Outcome
grain Fe concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.2 mg kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Fe spray increased grain Fe concentrations of landraces (3.4 mg kg−1) and cultivars (1.2 mg kg−1), but these increases were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“28 Chinese wheat landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–134 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Chinese wheat landraces as a genetic source for improving modern cultivars’ grain minerals.

Material
landracese0
Outcome
enhancing grain mineral levels in modern wheat cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chinese wheat landraces could serve as a potential genetic source for enhancing grain mineral levels in modern wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1553 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.