Paper · 2022 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Quantifying water stress of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars by crop water stress index under different irrigation regimes

Bijanzadeh, Ehsan; Moosavi, Seyed Mojtaba; Bahadori, Fatemeh

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Infrared thermometry allows evaluating water status of the crop by measuring crop water stress index (CWSI), without the need of physical contact to leaves. In order to quantify water stress by CWSI and finding the best irrigation regime a two-year field experiment was conducted in safflower during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons at Darab, Fars province, Iran. Two safflower cultivars (Goldasht and Local Isfahan) and four irrigation regimes consisted of well-watered [Irrigation based on 100% field capacity (FC)], mild (75% FC), severe (50% FC), and most severe (25% FC) water stress were arranged as split plot according to randomized completely block design with four replicates. The relationship between vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and canopy-air temperature differences (Tc-Ta) was plotted under upper (fully stressed) and lower baselines (non-stressed) equations. In two cultivars, by VPD increment, the distance between upper and lower base lines increased. In Goldasht, the upper baseline (Tc-Ta)ul, was 7.8°C in 2017 and 8.9°C in 2018. From April to July when air warmed, Tc-Ta differential was increased up to July and the highest seasonal CWSI (0.72 to 0.77) were obtained in Local Isfahan under most severe water stress. In 2017, under water stress, the highest relative water content (RWC; 55%), color quality (6-7) and water use efficiency (WUE; 2.69 g. m-2. mm-1) was observed in Goldasht under mild water stress which was more than 2018 and Local Isfahan. It might be attributed the more tolerance of Goldasht to water stress and lower air temperature and evaporation in the first year. CWSI with total water consumed (R2= 0.88**), RWC (R2= 0.87**), color quality (R2= 0.75*) and seed yield (R2= 0.83**) related, negatively. Overall, a mild water stress (75% FC) with 0.28 to 0.33 seasonal CWSI had higher RWC, color quality, WUE, with an acceptable yield, which could be the best irrigation regime under water deficit conditions for safflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest seasonal CWSI (0.72 to 0.77) occurred in Local Isfahan under the most severe water stress.

Material
Local Isfahane2
Treatment
most severe water stresse2
Outcome
seasonal CWSIe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
0.72 to 0.77e2
Setting
Darab, Fars province, Irane1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“a two-year field experiment was conducted in safflower during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons at Darab, Fars province, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–359 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest seasonal CWSI (0.72 to 0.77) were obtained in Local Isfahan under most severe water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mild water stress in 2017, Goldasht had the highest relative water content (55%).

Material
Goldashte3
Treatment
mild water stresse3
Outcome
relative water contente3
Direction
higheste3
Value
55%e3
Qualifier
In 2017e3
Comparator
Local Isfahane3
Setting
Darab, Fars province, Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“a two-year field experiment was conducted in safflower during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons at Darab, Fars province, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–359 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2017, under water stress, the highest relative water content (RWC; 55%), color quality (6-7) and water use efficiency (WUE; 2.69 g. m-2. mm-1) was observed in Goldasht under mild water stress which was more than 2018 and Local Isfahan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mild water stress in 2017, Goldasht had the highest color quality (6-7).

Material
Goldashte3
Treatment
mild water stresse3
Outcome
color qualitye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
6-7e3
Qualifier
In 2017e3
Comparator
Local Isfahane3
Setting
Darab, Fars province, Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“a two-year field experiment was conducted in safflower during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons at Darab, Fars province, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–359 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2017, under water stress, the highest relative water content (RWC; 55%), color quality (6-7) and water use efficiency (WUE; 2.69 g. m-2. mm-1) was observed in Goldasht under mild water stress which was more than 2018 and Local Isfahan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under mild water stress in 2017, Goldasht had the highest water use efficiency (2.69 g. m-2. mm-1).

Material
Goldashte3
Treatment
mild water stresse3
Outcome
water use efficiencye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
2.69 g. m-2. mm-1e3
Qualifier
In 2017e3
Comparator
Local Isfahane3
Setting
Darab, Fars province, Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“a two-year field experiment was conducted in safflower during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons at Darab, Fars province, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–359 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2017, under water stress, the highest relative water content (RWC; 55%), color quality (6-7) and water use efficiency (WUE; 2.69 g. m-2. mm-1) was observed in Goldasht under mild water stress which was more than 2018 and Local Isfahan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1472 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The distance between upper and lower baselines of canopy-air temperature difference increased with VPD increment.

Treatment
VPD incremente4
Outcome
distance between upper and lower baselinese4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“In two cultivars, by VPD increment, the distance between upper and lower baselines increased”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 872–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The upper baseline (Tc-Ta)ul of Goldasht was 7.8°C in 2017 and 8.9°C in 2018.

Material
Goldashte5
Outcome
upper baseline (Tc-Ta)ule5
Value
7.8°C in 2017 and 8.9°C in 2018e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Goldasht, the upper baseline (Tc-Ta)ul, was 7.8°C in 2017 and 8.9°C in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tc-Ta differential increased up to July as air warmed from April.

Outcome
Tc-Ta differentiale6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
From April to July when air warmede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“From April to July when air warmed, Tc-Ta differential was increased up to July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal CWSI was negatively related to total water consumed (R2= 0.88).

Treatment
CWSIe7
Outcome
total water consumede7
Direction
negativelye7
Value
R2= 0.88e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“CWSI with total water consumed (R2= 0.88**), RWC (R2= 0.87**), color quality (R2= 0.75*) and seed yield (R2= 0.83**) related, negatively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1741 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal CWSI was negatively related to relative water content (R2= 0.87).

Treatment
CWSIe7
Outcome
RWCe7
Direction
negativelye7
Value
R2= 0.87e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“CWSI with total water consumed (R2= 0.88**), RWC (R2= 0.87**), color quality (R2= 0.75*) and seed yield (R2= 0.83**) related, negatively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1741 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal CWSI was negatively related to color quality (R2= 0.75).

Treatment
CWSIe7
Outcome
color qualitye7
Direction
negativelye7
Value
R2= 0.75e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“CWSI with total water consumed (R2= 0.88**), RWC (R2= 0.87**), color quality (R2= 0.75*) and seed yield (R2= 0.83**) related, negatively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1741 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal CWSI was negatively related to seed yield (R2= 0.83).

Treatment
CWSIe7
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
negativelye7
Value
R2= 0.83e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“CWSI with total water consumed (R2= 0.88**), RWC (R2= 0.87**), color quality (R2= 0.75*) and seed yield (R2= 0.83**) related, negatively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1741 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A mild water stress (75% FC) with 0.28 to 0.33 seasonal CWSI could be the best irrigation regime under water deficit conditions for safflower.

Treatment
mild water stress (75% FC)e6
Outcome
best irrigation regime under water deficit conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Overall, a mild water stress (75% FC) with 0.28 to 0.33 seasonal CWSI had higher RWC, color quality, WUE, with an acceptable yield, which could be the best irrigation regime under water deficit conditions for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1961 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht may be more tolerant to water stress, with lower air temperature and evaporation in the first year as a possible explanation.

Material
Goldashte7
Outcome
more tolerance of Goldasht to water stresse7
Qualifier
lower air temperature and evaporation in the first yeare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“It might be attributed the more tolerance of Goldasht to water stress and lower air temperature and evaporation in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1603 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.