Paper · 2014 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Effect of Two Stimulating Substances on Fruiting and Fruit Quality of Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars.

Emad Girgis; Kamal Girgis; Goargiuos Olive; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out through 2012 and 2013 seasons to study the effect of mono-potassium phosphate (MKP) 0.3% and Hokley alpha (naphthalene acetic acid (NAA 0.45%) + naphthalene acetamide (NAD 1.2%) as foliar application on fruiting and fruit quality of “Picual” and “Manzanillo” Picual and Manzanillo olive cvs. planted in a private farm in an orchard 9 years pld at Cairo Alexandria Desert Road planted at 4X 6 meters apart. Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content. Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained. The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested treatments improved fruit set, yield and fruit characters of olive.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
tested treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit set, yield, fruit characterse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested treatments improved fruit oil content of olive.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
tested treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit oil contente1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested treatments reduced the number of dropped olive fruits.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
tested treatmentse2
Outcome
number of dropped fruitse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested treatments improved olive fruit retention.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
tested treatmentse2
Outcome
fruit retainede2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective treatment, spraying MKP and Hokley alpha before and at flowering, enhanced tree yield and oil content of olive.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % floweringe3
Outcome
tree yield and oil contente3
Direction
enhancinge3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective treatment, spraying MKP and Hokley alpha before and at flowering, reduced alternate bearing of olive.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Picual and Manzanillot0
Treatment
the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % floweringe3
Outcome
alternate bearinge3
Direction
reducinge3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–873 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.