Abstract
This study was carried out through 2012 and 2013 seasons to study the effect of mono-potassium phosphate (MKP) 0.3% and Hokley alpha (naphthalene acetic acid (NAA 0.45%) + naphthalene acetamide (NAD 1.2%) as foliar application on fruiting and fruit quality of “Picual” and “Manzanillo” Picual and Manzanillo olive cvs. planted in a private farm in an orchard 9 years pld at Cairo Alexandria Desert Road planted at 4X 6 meters apart. Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content. Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained. The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Most tested treatments improved fruit set, yield and fruit characters of olive.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- tested treatmentse1
- Outcome
- fruit set, yield, fruit characterse1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e1“Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content”
Claim · model-written summary
Most tested treatments improved fruit oil content of olive.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- tested treatmentse1
- Outcome
- fruit oil contente1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e1“Most tested treatments revealed positive effects and improved fruit set, yield, fruit characters and fruit oil content”
Claim · model-written summary
The tested treatments reduced the number of dropped olive fruits.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- tested treatmentse2
- Outcome
- number of dropped fruitse2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e2“Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained”
Claim · model-written summary
The tested treatments improved olive fruit retention.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- tested treatmentse2
- Outcome
- fruit retainede2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e2“Moreover, the tested treatments reduced the number of dropped fruits and improved fruit retained”
Claim · model-written summary
The most effective treatment, spraying MKP and Hokley alpha before and at flowering, enhanced tree yield and oil content of olive.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % floweringe3
- Outcome
- tree yield and oil contente3
- Direction
- enhancinge3
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e3“The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing”
Claim · model-written summary
The most effective treatment, spraying MKP and Hokley alpha before and at flowering, reduced alternate bearing of olive.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Material
- Picual and Manzanillot0
- Treatment
- the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % floweringe3
- Outcome
- alternate bearinge3
- Direction
- reducinge3
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Picual and Manzanillo Olive Cultivars”
e3“The most effective treatment was the spray of MKP at 1st February + Hokley alpha (NAA + NAD) before flowering then at 40 % flowering through enhancing tree yield and oil content, moreover besides reducing alternate bearing”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.