Paper · 1990 · HortScience

PLANT METHOD, GROUND COVER AND IRRIGATION LEVEL EFFECTS ON MUSKMELON PRODUCTION

Robert Wiedenfeld; Eden Hinojosa; Robert Stubblefield

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted in subtropical south Texas in 1989 to determine the effects of planting method, polyethylene mulch, and rate of drip irrigation on cantaloupe growth, yield and quality. Irrigation at .25, .50, .75, 1.0, or 1.25 times pan evaporation had little effect on soil moisture or yield, with all water application levels keeping the soil close to field capacity. Transplanting vs. direct seeding enhanced early vine growth and caused earlier yield, although direct seeded plants later caught up and had final cumulative yields slightly higher than the transplants. Black polyethylene mulch also improved earliness and reduced the number of culls compared to bare soil, but at the lowest watering level total yields were reduced by the mulch due to deflection of the rainfall received. The combined practices of transplanting and polyethylene mulch caused approximately a 9 day earliness advantage over the treatment that was direct seeded on bare soil although final yield was unaffected. Soil salinity buildup may cause problems which would affect the position of the drip line and the frequency and amount of water applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.25 to 1.25 times pan evaporation had little effect on soil moisture or yield.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Irrigation at .25, .50, .75, 1.0, or 1.25 times pan evaporatione0
Outcome
soil moisture or yielde0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at .25, .50, .75, 1.0, or 1.25 times pan evaporation had little effect on soil moisture or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting versus direct seeding enhanced early vine growth.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Transplantinge0
Outcome
early vine growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
direct seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanting vs. direct seeding enhanced early vine growth and caused earlier yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting versus direct seeding caused earlier yield.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Transplantinge0
Outcome
earlier yielde0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
direct seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanting vs. direct seeding enhanced early vine growth and caused earlier yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeded plants later caught up and had slightly higher final cumulative yields than transplants.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
direct seedede0
Outcome
final cumulative yieldse0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
transplantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although direct seeded plants later caught up and had final cumulative yields slightly higher than the transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch improved earliness compared with bare soil.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
earlinesse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
bare soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black polyethylene mulch also improved earliness and reduced the number of culls compared to bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polyethylene mulch reduced the number of culls compared with bare soil.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Black polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
number of cullse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
bare soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black polyethylene mulch also improved earliness and reduced the number of culls compared to bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the lowest watering level, mulch reduced total yields, attributed to deflection of the rainfall received.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
the mulche0
Outcome
total yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at the lowest watering levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the lowest watering level total yields were reduced by the mulch due to deflection of the rainfall received”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting combined with polyethylene mulch gave an approximately 9 day earliness advantage over direct seeding on bare soil.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
transplanting and polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
earlinesse0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
9 daye0
Comparator
direct seeded on bare soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined practices of transplanting and polyethylene mulch caused approximately a 9 day earliness advantage over the treatment that was direct seeded on bare soil although final yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final yield was unaffected by the combined transplanting and polyethylene mulch practices relative to direct seeding on bare soil.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
transplanting and polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Comparator
direct seeded on bare soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined practices of transplanting and polyethylene mulch caused approximately a 9 day earliness advantage over the treatment that was direct seeded on bare soil although final yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“MUSKMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

transplanting · phenology · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

transplanting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · phenology · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.