Paper · 1988 · American Journal of Botany

Effects of Ultraviolet-B Irradiation on Seedling Growth in the Pinaceae

Joe H. Sullivan; Alan H. Teramura

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
58
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ten conifer species were grown in an unshaded greenhouse at the University of Maryland under 3 levels of biologically effective ultraviolet-B radiation. Ultraviolet-B radiation was supplied by Westinghouse FS-40 sunlamps and effective daily doses were 0, 12.4, and 19.1 kJ m–2. During the irradiation period, seedling growth and the development of stress symptoms were monitored. After 22 weeks of irradiation, seedlings were harvested and morphological characteristics analyzed. Visual symptoms included needle discoloration and stunting in three of the ten species tested. Seedling height was significantly reduced by supplemental UV-B in Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Pinus resinosa (red pine), and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine). Biomass increased in Picea engelmannii (Engelmann spruce). Abies fraseri (Fraser fir), Pinus edulus (pinyon pine), and Pinus nigra (black pine) were unaffected by UV-B while biomass reductions exceeding 5% were observed in all other species tested. These deleterious effects occurred despite the presence of morphological characteristics which would tend to reduce UV-B effectiveness. Generally, the effects of supplemental UV-B dose were less for those species native to higher elevations, implying the presence of natural adaptations to UV-B.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Needle discoloration and stunting occurred in three species.

Taxon
PinaceaePinaceaet0
Organ / stage
needlee0
Outcome
needle discoloration and stuntinge0
Value
three of the ten speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Visual symptoms included needle discoloration and stunting in three of the ten species tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B significantly reduced seedling height in Pinus contorta.

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
supplemental UV-Be0
Outcome
Seedling heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling height was significantly reduced by supplemental UV-B in Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Pinus resinosa (red pine), and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B significantly reduced seedling height in Pinus resinosa.

Taxon
Pinus resinosaPinus resinosae0
Treatment
supplemental UV-Be0
Outcome
Seedling heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus resinosa
Pinus resinosa · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling height was significantly reduced by supplemental UV-B in Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Pinus resinosa (red pine), and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental UV-B significantly reduced seedling height in Pinus taeda.

Taxon
Pinus taedaPinus taedae0
Treatment
supplemental UV-Be0
Outcome
Seedling heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling height was significantly reduced by supplemental UV-B in Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine), Pinus resinosa (red pine), and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increased in Picea engelmannii.

Taxon
Picea engelmanniiPicea engelmanniie0
Treatment
Ultraviolet-Bt0
Outcome
Biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea engelmannii
Picea engelmannii · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass increased in Picea engelmannii (Engelmann spruce).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ultraviolet-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abies fraseri was unaffected by UV-B.

Taxon
Abies fraseriAbies fraserie0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
unaffectede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies fraseri
Abies fraseri · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abies fraseri (Fraser fir), Pinus edulus (pinyon pine), and Pinus nigra (black pine) were unaffected by UV-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus edulus was unaffected by UV-B.

Taxon
Pinus eduluse0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
unaffectede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Abies fraseri (Fraser fir), Pinus edulus (pinyon pine), and Pinus nigra (black pine) were unaffected by UV-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinus nigra was unaffected by UV-B.

Taxon
Pinus nigraPinus nigrae0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
unaffectede0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus nigra
Pinus nigra · TaxonKarl Gruber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abies fraseri (Fraser fir), Pinus edulus (pinyon pine), and Pinus nigra (black pine) were unaffected by UV-B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass fell by more than 5% in all other tested species.

Taxon
PinaceaePinaceaet0
Treatment
Ultraviolet-Bt0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
all other species testede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biomass reductions exceeding 5% were observed in all other species tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Ultraviolet-B Irradiation on Seedling Growth in the Pinaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species native to higher elevations generally had smaller supplemental UV-B effects.

Taxon
PinaceaePinaceaet0
Outcome
effects of supplemental UV-B dosee0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
higher elevationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, the effects of supplemental UV-B dose were less for those species native to higher elevations, implying the presence of natural adaptations to UV-B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–71 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Pinus resinosa (red pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

uv · growth · Picea engelmannii (Engelmann spruce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

uv · growth · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.