Paper · 2020 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Physiological potential of soybean industrially treated with different spray volumes and dry powder

Julia Abati; Cristian Rafael Brzezinski; Claudemir Zucareli; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The industrial treatment of seeds has favored the development of new technologies such as the use of dry powder. It has made application of spray volumes higher than those used in the conventional treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of industrial treatments at different spray volumes with and without application of dry powder on physiological quality of soybean seeds. A completely randomized experimental design was performed with four replications in a 5 x 2 factorial arrangement for cultivars BRS 359 RR and BRS 284. The factors were five spray volumes (0, 600, 1200, 1800 and 2400 mL. 100 kg-1) with and without the application of dry powder. The products used to obtain the volumes were fungicides (carbendazim + thiram); insecticides (imidacloprid + thiodicarb); nematicide (abamectin); micronutrients (cobalt, molybdenum and zinc); polymer (peridiam); biostimulant (kinetin + gibberellic acid + 4-indol-3-ylbutyric acid) and inoculant (Bradyrhizobium japonicum). The physiological quality of the seeds was determined by the following assessments: germination, first count of germination test, seedling emergence in sand, emergence speed index, and total length of the seedling shoot and root. The results showed that increased spray volume associated with the application of dry powder in seed treatment reduced the physiological quality of soybean seeds, and spray volumes up to 1200 mL 100 kg-1 in seed treatment without the application of dry powder do not impact the emergence and establishment of soybean seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased spray volume with dry powder in seed treatment reduced the physiological quality of soybean seeds.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
increased spray volume associated with the application of dry powder in seed treatmente1
Outcome
physiological quality of soybean seedse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“increased spray volume associated with the application of dry powder in seed treatment reduced the physiological quality of soybean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray volumes up to 1200 mL per 100 kg without dry powder do not affect emergence and establishment of soybean seedlings.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
spray volumes up to 1200 mL 100 kg-1 in seed treatment without the application of dry powdere2
Outcome
emergence and establishment of soybean seedlingse2
Direction
do not impacte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“spray volumes up to 1200 mL 100 kg-1 in seed treatment without the application of dry powder do not impact the emergence and establishment of soybean seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1553 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: general · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · quality: general · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: general · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 79 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 135 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 135 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

application · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 171 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 171 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.