Paper · 2021 · Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthcare

The Effect of Phosphorus and Transplanting Date on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Onion (Allium Cepa L.) Under Irrigated Conditions at Adami Tulu Jedo Kombolcha Woreda, Oromia Region

Tilaye Anbes

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was showed to decide the influence of transplanting date and phosphorus level on growth, yield and yield component of onion at Adami Tulu Jedo Kombolcha Woreda during 2017/18 season. The treatments comprised of three transplanting date (42, 49 and 56 days of transplanting date) and phosphorus levels (0, 23, 46, and 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 ). The experiment was laid out in RCBD with four replications. In this study, transplanting at 56 days of transplanting date fertilized with 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 recorded the highest total bulb yield and marketable bulb yield, but no significant difference was showed with that obtained at 46 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 with the same transplanting date. The economic analysis revealed that the highest net benefit with low cost of production was obtained in response to the application of 46 kg ha -1 and the transplanting age of 56 days. Keywords: bulb yield, Onion, economic analysis, phosphorus, transplanting date. DOI: 10.7176/JBAH/11-1-03 Publication date: January 31 st 2021

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting at 56 days with 69 kg P2O5 ha-1 gave the highest total and marketable bulb yield.

Taxon
Allium CepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
transplanting at 56 days of transplanting date fertilized with 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1e1
Outcome
total bulb yield and marketable bulb yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanting at 56 days of transplanting date fertilized with 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 recorded the highest total bulb yield and marketable bulb yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total and marketable bulb yield at 56 days with 69 kg P2O5 ha-1 did not differ significantly from 46 kg P2O5 ha-1 at the same transplanting date.

Taxon
Allium CepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
transplanting at 56 days of transplanting date fertilized with 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1e1
Outcome
bulb yielde1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
46 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanting at 56 days of transplanting date fertilized with 69 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 recorded the highest total bulb yield and marketable bulb yield, but no significant difference was showed with that obtained at 46 kg P 2 O 5 ha -1 with the same transplanting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 46 kg ha-1 with 56-day transplanting gave the highest net benefit at low production cost.

Taxon
Allium CepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
application of 46 kg ha -1 and the transplanting age of 56 dayse2
Outcome
net benefite2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
low cost of productione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium Cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“The economic analysis revealed that the highest net benefit with low cost of production was obtained in response to the application of 46 kg ha -1 and the transplanting age of 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–882 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

transplanting · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

transplanting · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.