Paper · 2022 · Applied Food Research

Effect of Solar Drying Methods on Proximate Composition, Sugar Profile and Organic Acids of Mango Varieties in Tanzania

Richard J. Mongi; Selestin J. Ngoma

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Solar drying is a simple and affordable alternative technology for reducing the enormous post-harvest losses of agricultural produce in developing countries. However, it may result in nutritional loss if not well applied. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of solar drying methods on proximate composition, sugars and organic acids of different mango varieties (Dodo, Viringe and Kent) in Tanzania. The varieties were dried using cabinet mixed-mode and tunnel dryers and analyzed for the named parameters. Potassium, sucrose and citric acids were the most abundant mineral, sugar and organic acids in mango varieties respectively. Proximate composition, sugars and organic acids differed significantly (p < 0.05) between fresh and dried samples and between drying methods with all fresh samples having higher values. Despite the loss, a significant quantity of proximate composition (> 65%), sugars (87-99%), and organic acids (71-80.1%) were retained in dried samples, with tunnel samples having higher retention than cabinet samples except for sugars. This suggests that solar drying technology is suitable for the preservation of mangoes due to its minimal effects on proximate composition, sugar and organic acids, hence, its application in the country is highly recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium was the most abundant mineral in mango varieties.

Outcome
Potassiume0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium, sucrose and citric acids were the most abundant mineral, sugar and organic acids in mango varieties respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose was the most abundant sugar in mango varieties.

Outcome
sucrosee0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium, sucrose and citric acids were the most abundant mineral, sugar and organic acids in mango varieties respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acids were the most abundant organic acids in mango varieties.

Outcome
citric acidse0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium, sucrose and citric acids were the most abundant mineral, sugar and organic acids in mango varieties respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh mango samples had significantly higher proximate composition, sugars and organic acids than dried samples.

Treatment
dried samplese0
Outcome
Proximate composition, sugars and organic acidse0
Direction
higher valuese0
Comparator
fresh samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proximate composition, sugars and organic acids differed significantly (p < 0.05) between fresh and dried samples and between drying methods with all fresh samples having higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying methods differed significantly in mango composition.

Treatment
drying methodse0
Outcome
Proximate composition, sugars and organic acidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proximate composition, sugars and organic acids differed significantly (p < 0.05) between fresh and dried samples and between drying methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried mango retained more than 65% of proximate composition.

Outcome
proximate compositione0
Direction
retainede0
Value
> 65%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant quantity of proximate composition (> 65%), sugars (87-99%), and organic acids (71-80.1%) were retained in dried samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried mango retained 87-99% of sugars.

Outcome
sugarse0
Direction
retainede0
Value
87-99%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant quantity of proximate composition (> 65%), sugars (87-99%), and organic acids (71-80.1%) were retained in dried samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried mango retained 71-80.1% of organic acids.

Outcome
organic acidse0
Direction
retainede0
Value
71-80.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant quantity of proximate composition (> 65%), sugars (87-99%), and organic acids (71-80.1%) were retained in dried samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tunnel drying retained more mango composition and organic acids than cabinet drying.

Treatment
tunnel samplese0
Outcome
retentione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except for sugarse0
Comparator
cabinet samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tunnel samples having higher retention than cabinet samples except for sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Proximate Composition, Sugar Profile and Organic Acids of Mango Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend solar drying to preserve mangoes.

Taxon
mangoesMangifera indicae0
Outcome
its application in the countrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“solar drying technology is suitable for the preservation of mangoes due to its minimal effects on proximate composition, sugar and organic acids, hence, its application in the country is highly recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1301 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.