Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of variety and drying methods on yield and quality of the Amchur prepared from fallen unripe mango fruits

P Sarada; V. Sudha Vani; R. Rajya Lakshmi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Influence of variety and drying methods on yield and quality of the amchur prepared from fallen unripe mango fruits” was carried out at Post harvest technology Laboratory, College of Horticulture, Venkataramannagudem, Dr. Y.S.R Horticultural University, West Godavari District of Andhra Pradesh during 2016-17. The experiment was laid out in Factorial CRD concept with three replications and 10 treatments. The experiment comprises of amchur prepared from fallen unripe mango fruits i.e., Chinnarasam, Nallarasam, Totapuri, Neelum and Local by using two different drying methods viz., sun drying and tray drying. The highest value of total sugars (16.05%), better retention of ascorbic acid (132.95mg 100 g-1), less moisture content (4.87%) and acidity (0.47%) were recorded in Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying was nutritionally good. Among the drying methods, tray drying was best in terms of quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying had the highest total sugars, 16.05%.

Material
Chinnarasame0
Treatment
tray dryinge0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.05%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fallen unripe mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of total sugars (16.05%), better retention of ascorbic acid (132.95mg 100 g-1), less moisture content (4.87%) and acidity (0.47%) were recorded in Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying was nutritionally good”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying had better retention of ascorbic acid, 132.95mg 100 g-1.

Material
Chinnarasame0
Treatment
tray dryinge0
Outcome
retention of ascorbic acide0
Direction
bettere0
Value
132.95mg 100 g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fallen unripe mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of total sugars (16.05%), better retention of ascorbic acid (132.95mg 100 g-1), less moisture content (4.87%) and acidity (0.47%) were recorded in Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying was nutritionally good”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying had less moisture content, 4.87%.

Material
Chinnarasame0
Treatment
tray dryinge0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
lesse0
Value
4.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fallen unripe mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of total sugars (16.05%), better retention of ascorbic acid (132.95mg 100 g-1), less moisture content (4.87%) and acidity (0.47%) were recorded in Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying was nutritionally good”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying had less acidity, 0.47%.

Material
Chinnarasame0
Treatment
tray dryinge0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fallen unripe mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of total sugars (16.05%), better retention of ascorbic acid (132.95mg 100 g-1), less moisture content (4.87%) and acidity (0.47%) were recorded in Chinnarasam variety dried by tray drying was nutritionally good”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tray drying was the best drying method for amchur quality.

Treatment
tray dryinge1
Outcome
qualitye1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fallen unripe mango fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the drying methods, tray drying was best in terms of quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–945 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.