Abstract
An adapted sustainable management program was used to evaluate lettuce tolerance to salt stress using autochthonous biostimulants (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), and compost). Salinity harmed plant growth, root colonization, and physiology. However, biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
AMF treatments improved lettuce biomass under stressed conditions by 120% relative to non-inoculated and compost-free controls.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- AMFe0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 120%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR treatments improved lettuce biomass under stressed conditions by 50% relative to non-inoculated and compost-free controls.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- PGPR treatmentse0
- Interactor
- PGPRe0symbiont
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 50%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF treatments improved stomatal conductance of stressed lettuce by 60% relative to controls.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- AMFe0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 60%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR treatments improved stomatal conductance of stressed lettuce by 20% relative to controls.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- PGPR treatmentse0
- Interactor
- PGPRe0symbiont
- Outcome
- stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 20%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF treatments improved chlorophyll fluorescence of stressed lettuce by 1.5% relative to controls.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- AMFe0
- Interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- chlorophyll fluorescencee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.5%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR treatments improved chlorophyll fluorescence of stressed lettuce by 1.3% relative to controls.
- Taxon
- lettuceLactuca sativae0
- Treatment
- PGPR treatmentse0
- Interactor
- PGPRe0symbiont
- Outcome
- chlorophyll fluorescencee0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.3%e0
- Qualifier
- under stressed conditionse0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated and compost-free controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e0“biostimulants application, especially AMF and PGPR treatments, significantly improved lettuce growth and salinity tolerance (120% and 50%, respectively, for biomass; 60% and 20%, respectively, for stomatal conductance; and 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively, for chlorophyll fluorescence) compared to non-inoculated and compost-free controls under stressed conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity harmed lettuce plant growth, root colonization and physiology.
- Taxon
- LettuceLactuca sativat0
- Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- plant growth, root colonization, and physiologye1
- Direction
- harmede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Promote Lettuce Growth”
e1“Salinity harmed plant growth, root colonization, and physiology”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · physiology: gas exchange · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
inoculation · physiology: gas exchange · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →inoculation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →salinity · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.