Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Application of Phenomics to Elucidate the Influence of Rootstocks on Drought Response of Tomato

Pratapsingh S. Khapte; Pradeep Kumar; Goraksha C. Wakchaure; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The cultivation of nutritionally and economically important crops like tomato are often threatened by dry spells due to drought as these crops largely depend on an assured water supply. The magnitude and intensity of drought is predicted to intensify under climate change scenarios, particularly in semi-arid regions, where water is already a scarce resource. Hence, it is imperative to devise strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of drought on tomato through improvement in the plant’s efficiency to utilise the moisture in the growth medium. Since the root is the entry point for water, its intrinsic structure and functions play a crucial role in maintaining the soil–water–plant continuum during moisture deficit at the rhizosphere. Grafting offers a great opportunity to replace the root system of the cultivated tomato plants with that of wild species and hence provide a rapid solution to modulate root system architecture in contrast to the time-consuming conventional breeding approach. However, the success in developing the best graft combination of cultivated tomato and rootstock depends on the source of rootstock and selection methods. In this study, we used a high throughput phenomics facility to assess the efficiency of tomato, grafted on the rootstocks of different genetic backgrounds, at different levels of moisture in the soil. Rootstocks included tomato cultivars and the hybrids, derived from the crosses involving wild relatives, as donor parents. Among the rootstocks, an interspecific (Solanum lycopersicum × S. pennellii) derivative RF4A was highly efficient in terms of productive use of water. The RF4A rootstock-grafted plants were more conservative in water use with higher plant water status through relatively better stomatal regulation and hence were more efficient in generating greater biomass under water stress conditions. These plants could maintain a higher level of PSII efficiency, signifying better photosynthetic efficiency even under water stress. The distinct response of interspecific rootstock, RF4A, to water stress can be ascribed to the effective root system acquired from a wild parent (S. pennellii), and hence efficient water uptake. Overall, we demonstrated the efficient use of a phenomics platform and developed a protocol to identify promising rootstock–scion combinations of tomato for optimization of water use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF4A was highly efficient in productive water use among rootstocks.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Material
RF4Ae0
Outcome
productive use of watere0
Direction
highly efficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the rootstocks, an interspecific (Solanum lycopersicum × S. pennellii) derivative RF4A was highly efficient in terms of productive use of water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF4A-grafted plants used water more conservatively and maintained higher water status under stress.

Material
RF4Ae0
Treatment
RF4A rootstock-graftede0
Outcome
water use with higher plant water statuse0
Direction
more conservativee0
Qualifier
under water stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RF4A rootstock-grafted plants were more conservative in water use with higher plant water status through relatively better stomatal regulation and hence were more efficient in generating greater biomass under water stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF4A-grafted plants had better stomatal regulation under water stress.

Material
RF4Ae1
Treatment
RF4A rootstock-graftede1
Outcome
stomatal regulatione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“through relatively better stomatal regulation and hence were more efficient in generating greater biomass under water stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1869 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RF4A rootstock-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF4A-grafted plants generated greater biomass under water stress.

Material
RF4Ae1
Treatment
RF4A rootstock-graftede1
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more efficient in generating greater biomass under water stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1869 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RF4A rootstock-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RF4A-grafted plants maintained higher PSII efficiency under water stress.

Material
RF4Ae1
Treatment
RF4A rootstock-graftede1
Outcome
PSII efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These plants could maintain a higher level of PSII efficiency, signifying better photosynthetic efficiency even under water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2001 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RF4A rootstock-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed the RF4A drought response to an effective root system acquired from S. pennellii and efficient water uptake.

Material
RF4Ae0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
efficient water uptakee0
Qualifier
effective root system acquired from a wild parent (S. pennellii)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distinct response of interspecific rootstock, RF4A, to water stress can be ascribed to the effective root system acquired from a wild parent (S. pennellii), and hence efficient water uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2002–2196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phenomics protocol identified promising tomato rootstock–scion combinations for water-use optimization.

Outcome
identify promising rootstock–scion combinations of tomatoe0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we demonstrated the efficient use of a phenomics platform and developed a protocol to identify promising rootstock–scion combinations of tomato for optimization of water use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2206–2380 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

grafting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.