Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Impact of Growth Retardant and Defoliant on Morpho-physiological Traits and Yield Improvement in Cotton

K. Dharani; V. Ravichandran; S. Anandakumar; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In cotton, mechanized harvesting has gained popularity in recent years due to labor-intensive process and shortage of labor. Moreover, mechanized harvesting of cotton depends on plant morphological characters like plant height, internodal length and synchronized boll maturity and opening etc. Mechanized harvesting enhancing the harvesting efficiency of cotton which is achieved by the use of some chemicals to attain good lint yield and fibre quality. With this background, the field experiment was conducted to study the impact of growth retardant and defoliant on morpho-physiological traits and yield improvement in cotton (CO 17) during 2021-2022 by following randomized block design with four treatments and five replications. The current study revealed that spraying of 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC) at square formation and boll development stage significantly reduced the leaf area, plant height, total dry weight and boll number when compared to control. However, chlorophyll content and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were recorded higher in 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC) applied treatments than control. Moreover, spraying of mepiquat chloride (0.015%) at square formation and boll development stage followed by spraying of 0.9% sodium chlorate (SC) at 60% boll bursting stage significantly increased the seed cotton yield compared to other treatments and recorded maximum seed cotton yield of 25.22% compared to control. Results clearly indicate that application of MC followed by SC could be a better practice for canopy management in cotton, resulting in improved efficiency of mechanical harvesting and good lint yield and fibre quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride reduced leaf area, plant height and total dry weight relative to control.

Organ / stage
square formation and boll development stagee0
Treatment
spraying of 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC)e0
Outcome
leaf area, plant height, total dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC) at square formation and boll development stage significantly reduced the leaf area, plant height, total dry weight and boll number when compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride reduced boll number relative to control.

Treatment
spraying of 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC)e0
Outcome
boll numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC) at square formation and boll development stage significantly reduced the leaf area, plant height, total dry weight and boll number when compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride increased chlorophyll content and NDVI relative to control.

Treatment
0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were recorded higher in 0.015% mepiquat chloride (MC) applied treatments than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride followed by sodium chlorate significantly increased seed cotton yield, reaching 25.22% relative to control.

Treatment
spraying of mepiquat chloride (0.015%) at square formation and boll development stage followed by spraying of 0.9% sodium chlorate (SC) at 60% boll bursting stagee0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.22%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying of mepiquat chloride (0.015%) at square formation and boll development stage followed by spraying of 0.9% sodium chlorate (SC) at 60% boll bursting stage significantly increased the seed cotton yield compared to other treatments and recorded maximum seed cotton yield of 25.22% compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend MC followed by SC for cotton canopy management and mechanical harvesting.

Treatment
application of MC followed by SCe0
Outcome
better practice for canopy managemente0
Qualifier
improved efficiency of mechanical harvesting and good lint yield and fibre qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of MC followed by SC could be a better practice for canopy management in cotton, resulting in improved efficiency of mechanical harvesting and good lint yield and fibre quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1668 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

mepiquat chloride · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chloride · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.