Paper · 2022 · PLoS ONE

Effects of LED supplemental lighting on the growth and metabolomic profile of Taxus baccata cultivated in a smart greenhouse

Ilaria Chiocchio; Alberto Barbaresi; Lorenzo Barbanti; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
36
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Light emitting diode (LED) lamps are increasingly being studied in cultivation of horticultural, ornamental and medicinal plants as means to increase yield, quality, stress resistance, and bioactive compounds content. Enhancing the production of metabolites for medicinal or pharmaceutical use by regulating LED intensity and spectra is a challenging subject, where promising results have been achieved. Nevertheless, some species have been poorly investigated, despite their interest as a source of medicinally active substances, with particular reference to LED effects at the plant cultivation level. This study evaluates the effects of supplementary top-light LED treatments on Taxus baccata, one of the main sources of taxane precursors. Blue, red and mixed red-and-blue spectra were tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1. Moreover, 50 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 intensities were tested for the mixed spectrum. All treatments were set for 14 hours a day and were tested against natural light as control treatment, in a controlled environment, from 19 August to 9 December 2019, this latter date representing 112 days after treatment (DAT) began. A smart monitoring and control system powered by environmental and proximal sensors was implemented to assure homogeneity of temperature, humidity, and base natural light for all the treatments. It resulted in negligible deviations from expected values and reliable exclusion of confusing factors. Biometric measurements and 1H-NMR based metabolomic analysis were performed to investigate growth and phytochemical profile throughout the trial. One-way ANOVA showed that supplemental LED lighting increased plant height and number of sprouts. Considering the mixed red-and-blue spectrum, plant height increased almost proportionally from control to 100 μM m-2 s-1 (+20% at 112 DAT), with no further increase at higher intensity. The number of sprouts was strongly enhanced by LED treatments only in the early phase (48.9 vs. 7.5 sprouts in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control at 28 DAT), with no differences related to intensity in the very early stage, and more persisting effects (up to 56 DAT) for higher intensities. After the very early growth stages (28 DAT), plant vigor showed a modest although significant increase over time compared to the control, with no differences related to light intensity (0.81 vs. 0.74 of NDVI in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control, across 56, 84 and 112 DAT). The different spectra tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1 showed no significant differences in growth parameters, except for a slight beneficial influence of blue (alone or with red) compared to only red for sprouting. According to the metabolomic analysis, treated plants at 28 DAT were characterized by the highest content of sucrose and aromatic compounds. Signals of a putative taxane were detected in the 1H NMR profiles of plants, which were compared to the spectrum of baccatin III standard. However, the intensity of these spectral signals was not affected by the treatment, while they increased only slightly during time. Light at 150 μM m-2 s-1 induced the strongest variation in the metabolome. Conversely, light composition did not induce significant differences in the metabolome.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The monitoring system had negligible deviations from expected environmental values.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Outcome
negligible deviations from expected valuese0
Comparator
expected valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“It resulted in negligible deviations from expected values and reliable exclusion of confusing factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental LED lighting increased plant height and sprouts.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
supplemental LED lightinge0
Outcome
plant height and number of sproutse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“supplemental LED lighting increased plant height and number of sprouts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed red and blue light at 100 μM m-2 s-1 increased height by 20% at 112 DAT versus control.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
mixed red-and-blue spectrume0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+20%e0
Qualifier
at 112 DATe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Considering the mixed red-and-blue spectrum, plant height increased almost proportionally from control to 100 μM m-2 s-1 (+20% at 112 DAT), with no further increase at higher intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher mixed-light intensity produced no further height increase.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
higher intensitye0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
no further increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“with no further increase at higher intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed-light treatments averaged 48.9 sprouts versus 7.5 in controls at 28 DAT.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
LED treatmentse0
Outcome
number of sproutse0
Direction
strongly enhancede0
Value
48.9 vs. 7.5 sproutse0
Qualifier
at 28 DATe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of sprouts was strongly enhanced by LED treatments only in the early phase (48.9 vs. 7.5 sprouts in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control at 28 DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–2035 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprout effects showed no intensity differences early but persisted to 56 DAT at higher intensities.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Outcome
no differences related to intensity in the very early stagee0
Qualifier
up to 56 DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“with no differences related to intensity in the very early stage, and more persisting effects (up to 56 DAT) for higher intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LED treatments modestly increased NDVI over time after 28 DAT, 0.81 versus 0.74 in controls.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1e0
Outcome
plant vigore0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.81 vs. 0.74 of NDVIe0
Qualifier
across 56, 84 and 112 DATe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant vigor showed a modest although significant increase over time compared to the control, with no differences related to light intensity (0.81 vs. 0.74 of NDVI in the averaged 50, 100 and 150 μM m-2 s-1 vs. the control, across 56, 84 and 112 DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2215–2465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 μM m-2 s-1, spectra did not significantly differ in growth parameters.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
different spectra tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The different spectra tested at 100 μM m-2 s-1 showed no significant differences in growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light, alone or with red, slightly benefited sprouting over red alone.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
blue (alone or with red)e0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
beneficiale0
Comparator
only rede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“a slight beneficial influence of blue (alone or with red) compared to only red for sprouting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2580–2673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 28 DAT treated plants had highest sucrose and aromatic compound content.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
content of sucrose and aromatic compoundse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at 28 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“treated plants at 28 DAT were characterized by the highest content of sucrose and aromatic compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2713–2814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A putative taxane was detected in plant NMR profiles.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Outcome
Signals of a putative taxane were detectede0
Comparator
baccatin III standarde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Signals of a putative taxane were detected in the 1H NMR profiles of plants, which were compared to the spectrum of baccatin III standard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2815–2953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment did not affect putative taxane signal intensity.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
the treatmente0
Outcome
intensity of these spectral signalse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the intensity of these spectral signals was not affected by the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2963–3036 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Putative taxane signals increased slightly over time.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Outcome
theye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“they increased only slightly during time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3044–3085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 μM m-2 s-1 light caused the strongest metabolome variation.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
Light at 150 μM m-2 s-1e0
Outcome
variation in the metabolomee0
Direction
strongeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Light at 150 μM m-2 s-1 induced the strongest variation in the metabolome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3086–3160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light composition did not significantly alter the metabolome.

Taxon
Taxus baccataTaxus baccatat0
Treatment
light compositione0
Outcome
the metabolomee0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Taxus baccata
Taxus baccata · TaxonSitomon · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Taxus baccata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“light composition did not induce significant differences in the metabolome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3173–3248 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Taxus baccata (English yew)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Taxus baccata (English yew)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.