Paper · 2022 · Crop and Pasture Science

Yield, zinc efficiencies and biofortification of wheat with zinc sulfate application in soil and foliar nanozinc fertilisation

Arshad Jalal; Fernando Shintate Galindo; Leandro Alves Freitas; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Context Agronomic biofortification of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with zinc (Zn) is an effective approach to increase grain Zn concentration and productivity and alleviate Zn malnutrition in humans. Foliar Zn application is an alternative strategy to endorse soil Zn deficiency with better grain Zn partitioning. Aims This study aimed to better understand dose management of soil and foliar Zn application in wheat for biofortification. Methods The objectives was to evaluate the effect of foliar applied nano Zn doses (0, 0.75, 1.5, 3 and 6 kg/ha (zinc oxide, ZnO) 50% at tillering and 50% at grain filling in combination) with soil Zn application (0 and 8 kg/ha, as zinc sulfate) on growth, nutrition, Zn use efficiencies, intake and yield biofortification of wheat in 2019 and 2020 under Brazilian savanna. Key results Combined foliar and soil Zn application increased shoot and grains Zn concentration and accumulation with greater dry matter (9.8 and 10.6%) and grain yield (9.8 and 11%) of wheat as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively. Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE), Zn utilisation efficiency and applied Zn recovery improved with soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zn, but decreased with further increase in foliar Zn application. Zn sulfate stood out for increasing crop productivity while foliar spray with nano Zn for better grains biofortification of wheat. Conclusions Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zn increased plant and grains Zn concentration and accumulation, dry matter, grain yield, Zn partitioning index and Zn intake in wheat in tropical conditions of Brazil. Implications The combined application of soil and foliar Zn in harsh tropical savannah condition could better improve Zn nutrition, crop growth, and productivity with better Zn biofortification and intake of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased wheat shoot zinc concentration and accumulation.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione0
Outcome
shoot and grains Zn concentration and accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application increased shoot and grains Zn concentration and accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc increased wheat grain zinc concentration and accumulation.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grains Zn concentration and accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application increased shoot and grains Zn concentration and accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc application increased dry matter by 9.8% in 2019.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione1
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.8e0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater dry matter (9.8 and 10.6%) and grain yield (9.8 and 11%) of wheat as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc application increased dry matter by 10.6% in 2020.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione1
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10.6%e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater dry matter (9.8 and 10.6%) and grain yield (9.8 and 11%) of wheat as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc application increased wheat grain yield by 9.8% in 2019.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.8e0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater dry matter (9.8 and 10.6%) and grain yield (9.8 and 11%) of wheat as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined zinc application increased wheat grain yield by 11% in 2020.

Treatment
Combined foliar and soil Zn applicatione1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
11%e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater dry matter (9.8 and 10.6%) and grain yield (9.8 and 11%) of wheat as compared to control in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined foliar and soil Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 2.5 kg/ha foliar nanozinc improved zinc use efficiency.

Treatment
soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zne0
Outcome
Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE), Zn utilisation efficiency and applied Zn recovery improved with soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 2.5 kg/ha foliar nanozinc improved zinc utilisation efficiency.

Treatment
soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zne0
Outcome
Zn utilisation efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE), Zn utilisation efficiency and applied Zn recovery improved with soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 2.5 kg/ha foliar nanozinc improved applied zinc recovery.

Treatment
soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zne0
Outcome
applied Zn recoverye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE), Zn utilisation efficiency and applied Zn recovery improved with soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further foliar zinc increases decreased zinc use efficiency, utilisation efficiency and recovery.

Treatment
further increase in foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
ZnUEe1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but decreased with further increase in foliar Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate increased crop productivity.

Treatment
Zn sulfatee0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn sulfate stood out for increasing crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nanozinc improved grain biofortification.

Treatment
foliar spray with nano Zne0
Outcome
grains biofortificatione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray with nano Zn for better grains biofortification of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 3 kg/ha foliar nanozinc increased plant and grain zinc concentration and accumulation.

Treatment
Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zne0
Outcome
plant and grains Zn concentration and accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zn increased plant and grains Zn concentration and accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 3 kg/ha foliar nanozinc increased wheat dry matter and grain yield.

Treatment
Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zne1
Outcome
dry matter, grain yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Setting
Brazile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter, grain yield, Zn partitioning index and Zn intake in wheat in tropical conditions of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1625 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 3 kg/ha foliar nanozinc increased zinc partitioning index and intake.

Treatment
Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zne1
Outcome
Zn partitioning index and Zn intakee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Setting
Brazile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter, grain yield, Zn partitioning index and Zn intake in wheat in tropical conditions of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1625 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil Zn application along with 3 kg/ha of foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1460 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.