Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil zinc plus 2.5 kg/ha foliar nanozinc improved zinc use efficiency.

A claim from Yield, zinc efficiencies and biofortification of wheat with zinc sulfate application in soil and foliar nanozinc fertilisation · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc plus 2.5 kg/ha foliar nanozinc improved zinc use efficiency.

Treatment
soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zne0
Outcome
Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc use efficiency (ZnUE), Zn utilisation efficiency and applied Zn recovery improved with soil Zn application and 2.5 kg/ha foliar nano Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1197
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54

Title

Yield, zinc efficiencies and biofortification of wheat with zinc sulfate application in soil and foliar nanozinc fertilisation

Arshad Jalal; Fernando Shintate Galindo; Leandro Alves Freitas; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2022. doi:10.1071/cp21458

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e323dae860243076a23def33338dd36fa1e60278ada13858fdacfd21bc14376c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.