Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Straw Mulching and Nitrogen Doses on Nutrient Status, Yield and Economics of Rabi Maize

Ratan Kumar Rout; Ashirbachan Mahapatra; Tanmoy Shankar; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

At experimental farm of M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi, Odisha, India, an experiment was conducted to know the effect of nitrogen doses and mulching on nutrient status, yield and economics of maize during the rabi season of 2021-22. The hybrid maize seed (Hybrid variety 4226) was sown in a spilt plot design with three levels of mulching in main plot and four doses of nitrogen in sub-plot. The grain yield, nutrient composition of maize seeds and stover, N, P, K status of pre-harvest soil were increased significantly in combination of nitrogen and mulching. Application of straw mulch significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover as compared to no mulch treatment. It also influenced the protein content of seeds. Application of higher dose of N significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover over the control and also influenced the NPK status of soil and protein content of the seeds. Maximum values of grain and stover yield (7.26 and 9.21t ha-1 respectively) were recorded from 5 t ha-1mulchand 150% RDN (N:P2O5:K2O = 120:60:60) plot. Whereas this interaction effect (5 t ha-1 and 150% RDN) significantly increased the N content of seeds (1.40 %), stover (0.47 %), and protein content of seeds (8.76 %). After decomposition of straw mulch in soil with additional application of nitrogen increased the available N (195.43 kg ha-1) over low level of nitrogen dose with no mulching. The combined application of mulching @ 5 t ha-1 with 150% RDN resulted highest net return (₹76,365/- ha-1) with maximum B:C ratio (1.29).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and mulching significantly increased grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of nitrogen and mulchinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrient composition of maize seeds and stover, N, P, K status of pre-harvest soil were increased significantly in combination of nitrogen and mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and mulching significantly increased nutrient composition of maize seeds and stover.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of nitrogen and mulchinge0
Outcome
nutrient composition of maize seeds and stovere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrient composition of maize seeds and stover, N, P, K status of pre-harvest soil were increased significantly in combination of nitrogen and mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and mulching significantly increased N, P, K status of pre-harvest soil.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of nitrogen and mulchinge0
Outcome
N, P, K status of pre-harvest soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield, nutrient composition of maize seeds and stover, N, P, K status of pre-harvest soil were increased significantly in combination of nitrogen and mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased maize N content of grain and stover versus no mulch.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
N content of grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no mulch treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover as compared to no mulch treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased maize N uptake by grain and stover versus no mulch.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
N uptake by grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no mulch treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover as compared to no mulch treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch influenced maize seed protein content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulche0
Outcome
protein content of seedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of straw mulch significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover as compared to no mulch treatment. It also influenced the protein content of seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen dose significantly increased N content of grain and stover versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher dose of Ne0
Outcome
N content of grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of higher dose of N significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover over the control and also influenced the NPK status of soil and protein content of the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen dose significantly increased N uptake by grain and stover versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher dose of Ne0
Outcome
N uptake by grain and stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of higher dose of N significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover over the control and also influenced the NPK status of soil and protein content of the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen dose influenced NPK status of soil.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher dose of Ne0
Outcome
NPK status of soile0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of higher dose of N significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover over the control and also influenced the NPK status of soil and protein content of the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen dose influenced protein content of the seeds.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher dose of Ne0
Outcome
protein content of the seedse0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of higher dose of N significantly increased the N content of grain and stover as well as the N uptake by grain and stover over the control and also influenced the NPK status of soil and protein content of the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch at 5 t/ha plus 150% RDN produced maximum maize grain yield of 7.26 t/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t ha-1mulchand 150% RDNe0
Outcome
grain and stover yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
7.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of grain and stover yield (7.26 and 9.21t ha-1 respectively) were recorded from 5 t ha-1mulchand 150% RDN (N:P2O5:K2O = 120:60:60) plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch at 5 t/ha plus 150% RDN produced maximum stover yield of 9.21 t/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t ha-1mulchand 150% RDNe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
9.21t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of grain and stover yield (7.26 and 9.21t ha-1 respectively) were recorded from 5 t ha-1mulchand 150% RDN (N:P2O5:K2O = 120:60:60) plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and 150% RDN significantly increased N content of seeds to 1.40 %.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t ha-1 and 150% RDNe0
Outcome
N content of seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.40 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas this interaction effect (5 t ha-1 and 150% RDN) significantly increased the N content of seeds (1.40 %), stover (0.47 %), and protein content of seeds (8.76 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and 150% RDN significantly increased N content of stover to 0.47 %.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t ha-1 and 150% RDNe0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.47 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas this interaction effect (5 t ha-1 and 150% RDN) significantly increased the N content of seeds (1.40 %), stover (0.47 %), and protein content of seeds (8.76 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch and 150% RDN significantly increased protein content of seeds to 8.76 %.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t ha-1 and 150% RDNe0
Outcome
protein content of seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.76 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whereas this interaction effect (5 t ha-1 and 150% RDN) significantly increased the N content of seeds (1.40 %), stover (0.47 %), and protein content of seeds (8.76 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposed straw mulch with nitrogen increased available soil N to 195.43 kg/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
straw mulch in soil with additional application of nitrogene0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
195.43 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
low level of nitrogen dose with no mulchinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After decomposition of straw mulch in soil with additional application of nitrogen increased the available N (195.43 kg ha-1) over low level of nitrogen dose with no mulching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1575 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching at 5 t/ha plus 150% RDN yielded highest net return of ₹76,365/- ha-1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulching @ 5 t ha-1 with 150% RDNe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹76,365/- ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of mulching @ 5 t ha-1 with 150% RDN resulted highest net return (₹76,365/- ha-1) with maximum B:C ratio (1.29).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching at 5 t/ha plus 150% RDN yielded maximum B:C ratio of 1.29.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulching @ 5 t ha-1 with 150% RDNe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.29e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of mulching @ 5 t ha-1 with 150% RDN resulted highest net return (₹76,365/- ha-1) with maximum B:C ratio (1.29).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rabi Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–97 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

organic · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 33 positive, 11 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 40 positive, 9 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.