Paper · 2020 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Effects of drought stress on early seedling growth and ecophysiology of beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon grown in screenhouse-potted soil

Tabot Pascal Tabi; Mfombep Priscilla Mebong; Wase, Odine Stephinia

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

With changing rainfall patterns, deforestation and degradation of arable land, freshwater resources for irrigation are reducing, increasing the potential for drought stress on crops. The aim of this research was to study the growth and ecophysiological responses of beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon potted and grown in screenhouse under varied irrigation, for 14 days. There were three treatments: zero irrigation after seedling establishment, 0.1 L/pot/week, 0.2 L/pot/week and 0.3 L/pot/week respectively, each pot with three plants, in a completely randomized design with 3 replicates. Growth and ecophysiological measurements were recorded for the first three weeks of growth. ANOVA and Pearson Correlation were conducted, with significance at α 0.05. Plants with zero irrigation had the least growth in all parameters measured; growth was stimulated by irrigation, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week (corresponding to 2200 mm, the mean annual rainfall for the region) for pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings. Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased. The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased, while pepper and tomato remained low in all treatments, indicating stress. These results show that early seedling stages are sensitive to drought; however, beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings. Early farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous crops in the field. This is essential in a future where irrigation water deficits are predicted to increase during the cropping seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings with zero irrigation had the least growth in all parameters measured.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
zero irrigatione0
Outcome
growth in all parameters measurede0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants with zero irrigation had the least growth in all parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth was stimulated by irrigation, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week for pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings.

Taxon
pepper, tomato and watermelone0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
threshold at 0.2 L/weeke0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth was stimulated by irrigation, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week (corresponding to 2200 mm, the mean annual rainfall for the region) for pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
Biomass accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency (WUE) decreased with irrigation in all species.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased.

Taxon
beans and watermelone0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistrye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of pepper and tomato remained low in all irrigation treatments, indicating stress.

Taxon
pepper and tomatoe0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistrye1
Direction
remained lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1163 · show in text ↑
e0

“pepper and tomato remained low in all treatments, indicating stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1294 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings.

Taxon
beans and watermelon seedlingse0
Outcome
resistant to soil moisture deficite0
Direction
more resistante0
Comparator
tomato and pepper seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1485 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous crops in the field.

Taxon
cropse0
Outcome
appropriate irrigation volumese0

Verbatim

e0

“Early farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous crops in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1603 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.