Paper · 2020 · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews

Effects of drought stress on early seedling growth and ecophysiology of beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon grown in screenhouse-potted soil

Tabot Pascal Tabi; Mfombep Priscilla Mebong; Odine Stephinia Wase

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

With changing rainfall patterns, deforestation and degradation of arable land, freshwater resources for irrigation are reducing, increasing the potential for drought stress on crops. The aim of this research was to study the growth and ecophysiological responses of beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon potted and grown in screenhouse under varied irrigation, for 14 days. There were three treatments: zero irrigation after seedling establishment, 0.1 L/pot/week, 0.2 L/pot/week and 0.3 L/pot/week respectively, each pot with three plants, in a completely randomized design with 3 replicates. Growth and ecophysiological measurements were recorded for the first three weeks of growth. ANOVA and Pearson Correlation were conducted, with significance at α 0.05. Plants with zero irrigation had the least growth in all parameters measured; growth was stimulated by irrigation, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week (corresponding to 2200 mm, the mean annual rainfall for the region) for pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings. Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased. The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased, while pepper and tomato remained low in all treatments, indicating stress. These results show that early seedling stages are sensitive to drought; however, beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings. Early farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous crops in the field. This is essential in a future where irrigation water deficits are predicted to increase during the cropping seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero irrigation gave the least growth in all measured parameters of the seedlings.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
zero irrigatione0
Outcome
growth in all parameters measurede0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants with zero irrigation had the least growth in all parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation stimulated growth of pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week.

Taxon
pepper, tomato and watermelone1
Treatment
irrigatione1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
stimulatede1
Qualifier
threshold at 0.2 L/weeke1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth was stimulated by irrigation, with a threshold at 0.2 L/week (corresponding to 2200 mm, the mean annual rainfall for the region) for pepper, tomato and watermelon seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass accumulation of all species increased with irrigation.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
Biomass accumulatione2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency (WUE) decreased with irrigation.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Treatment
irrigatione2
Outcome
WUEe2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biomass accumulation in all species increased with irrigation but WUE decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased.

Taxon
beans and watermelone3
Treatment
irrigatione3
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistrye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
0.8e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased, while pepper and tomato remained low in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1275 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper and tomato kept low quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry in all treatments.

Taxon
pepper and tomatoe3
Outcome
quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistrye3
Direction
remained lowe3
Qualifier
in all treatmentse3

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“The quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry of beans and watermelon increased to 0.8 as irrigation increased, while pepper and tomato remained low in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings.

Taxon
beans and watermelon seedlingse4
Treatment
soil moisture deficite4
Outcome
resistante4
Direction
more resistante4
Comparator
tomato and pepper seedlingse4

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“beans and watermelon seedlings were more resistant to soil moisture deficit than tomato and pepper seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early seedling stages are sensitive to drought.

Taxon
beans, pepper, tomato and watermelont0
Organ / stage
early seedling stagese5
Outcome
sensitive to droughte5

Verbatim

t0

“beans, pepper, tomato and watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“early seedling stages are sensitive to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1366 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous field crops.

Taxon
cropse6
Outcome
appropriate irrigation volumese6

Verbatim

e6

“Early farm management should consider appropriate irrigation volumes for better and more vigorous crops in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1603 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.